To: rabscuttle385
Romney is a liberal fascist, and his Mass. health care shenanigans have fueled the Democrats continued march towards Communism here in the US.
I don't see it that way. What it means to me is that even if a universal health care system is implemented by a person who believes in free market capitalism, what you end up with is what we have in Massachusetts. If we look at the details of what happened there, we have one more data point on what we want or do not want for America. We now have UK, Canada, and Mass. to warn us what will happen. If we didn't have those data points, people may have fallen for the “impossible dream” of what the left promises. I think we can't have anything like that in America, or every time the Democrats get into power they will evolve it in that direction. I am sorry for Massachusetts, but if they want the system, I am glad for them to be there as a warning to the rest of the country.
So I think the Massachusetts experiment makes it less likely we will have the same for America, not more likely.
To: broncobilly
Maine already created a single payer monster. Tennessee has failed. Oregon is failing.
There’s plenty of examples out there. All bad. With Mittless, it’s a variation of the, “It’s not Socialism when I do it” mentality.
8 posted on
08/29/2009 1:16:19 AM PDT by
Leisler
To: broncobilly
Yes, Romney is a liberal (duty cycle ~ 99.8% pure liberal)
fascist (and a proven fascist, at that).
10 posted on
08/29/2009 4:24:50 AM PDT by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: broncobilly
You remind me of the Black Knight from Monty Python...
12 posted on
08/29/2009 5:09:15 AM PDT by
ejonesie22
(There's something socialist in the neighborhood, who ya gonna call? MITTBUSTERS!)
To: broncobilly
What it means to me is that even if a universal health care system is implemented by a person who believes in free market capitalism”
No one who believes in free market capitalism would ever implement any “universal health care system”.
Romney is a typical liberal- he believes in less freedom for the little people.
17 posted on
08/29/2009 9:53:13 AM PDT by
Favor Center
(Targets up! Hold hard and favor center!)
To: broncobilly
I don't see it that way. What it means to me is that even if a universal health care system is implemented by a person who believes in free market capitalism, what you end up with is what we have in Massachusetts. If we look at the details of what happened there, we have one more data point on what we want or do not want for America. We now have UK, Canada, and Mass. to warn us what will happen. If we didn't have those data points, people may have fallen for the impossible dream of what the left promises. I think we can't have anything like that in America, or every time the Democrats get into power they will evolve it in that direction. I am sorry for Massachusetts, but if they want the system, I am glad for them to be there as a warning to the rest of the country. So I think the Massachusetts experiment makes it less likely we will have the same for America, not more likely. The problem is, the donks are already using the failure in Massachusetts to argue that the GOP is wrong about health care, and what we really need is "single payer." Because Romney signed it and now champions it, its failure gets hung around the necks of the GOP as a whole.
22 posted on
08/31/2009 4:31:15 PM PDT by
ellery
(It's a free country.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson