Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EDINVA
"That doesn’t remove the legitimacy of her question about the legitimacy of the person doing the ordering to hold his position."

No. But it does mean that the Army would have great difficulty just revoking the orders that they've already issued for an involuntary deployment, without opening the flood gates to a host of other challenges - something I'm sure that they don't want. That was the point I was making.

97 posted on 08/28/2009 11:26:47 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

I’m not expert in either the Army or law, or politics for that matter ... but I don’t see how they could rescind her orders, either. But I imagine if nothing goes her way in court before 9/12, she will report to Benning and go on to Iraq rather than face court martial.


98 posted on 08/28/2009 11:30:11 PM PDT by EDINVA (A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul -- G. B. Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson