Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ReignOfError
Think of your question for a moment. BOTH ways.

Your right, British law doesn't determine US citizenship.

However, you omit the opposite question.

Does US law determine British citizenship? The answer is equally no. Therefore, his admitted British citizenship AT birth is most relavent.

404 posted on 08/29/2009 9:06:55 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid
Does US law determine British citizenship? The answer is equally no. Therefore, his admitted British citizenship AT birth is most relavent.

In Britain.

It's a simple principle: Citizenship status, including "natural-born" status, is a question of US law. Full stop. The laws of other countries are irrelevant. We don't ask whether the Republic of Panama considered John McCain to be a Panamanian citizen, and we don't give other countries the power to make someone ineligible to be our president by the stroke of a pen.

432 posted on 08/30/2009 6:47:50 AM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 404 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson