Well, I read the story over again, and I can see how there can be differences of opinion about it. The doctor seems to me to have made a very questionable decision. He admits that he “hastened her death.” But it is arguable on the evidence given.
Yes, it was an emergency, but I don’t think that necessarily excuses ending a life. The four nurses he mentions could probably have carried her down. And it’s perfectly possible to bring the intravenous drip along—I’ve been in that position myself.
Then if she died, she died, and it couldn’t be helped. But no one deliberately hastened her death.
I don’t know all the factors involved, so maybe no wrong was done.
As for the Grand Jury decision, the article says they were dealing with a couple of other cases. Whatever this doctor did was not known at the time, so he was not under investigation then.