[socialismislost]

I see you still refuse to look up the definition. History is a description GGG. History can be a description of science. It is not science, no matter how many times you try to equate the two. Vast Majority? Dont think so. And I happen to disagree with global warming as well. The sun is the main ingredient in weather patterns. A supervolcanoe eruption in the past has unleashed more CO2 than everything humans have emmitted up to date. At one time. Humans contribute very little to climate change.

[GodGunsGuts]

As I stated before, historical science means science that attempts to reconstruct the unobservable, unrepeatable past. This is common knowledge. You really ought to consider reading up on it before publicly commenting on the subject again. And while I agree that the notion of anthropogenic global warming is based on junk science, I don't see what that has to do with our present discussion.