Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dynachrome
Thanks dynachrome!

I didn't find much new broken ground in this article re this legislation since we've covered it on numerous other threads but I have added "our" keywords to the list so that the tag will be there for those wishing to follow along.

FWIW, it pains me to see the States having to resort to such extraordinary measures, particularly when they may in fact be weakening their AND our position as it relates to addlebrained decisions by the SCOTUS and how they have applied the "commerce clause". I could be wrong but it appears to me the States pursuing this tack are essentially conceding the ground set by "precedent" that the federales in fact have the authority to regulate anything remotely construed to be interstate commerce. I just hope better minds than mine have a better view of the bigger picture.

125 posted on 08/27/2009 9:44:36 AM PDT by ForGod'sSake (You have two choices and two choices only: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

It’s a decent overview, though I find the “20 states” part to be over optimistic.


147 posted on 08/27/2009 1:07:44 PM PDT by dynachrome (I am Jim Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson