Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris
Let me put it this way: Do you feel that cervical cancer is an appropriate punishment for a daughter who messes up and goes too far? Better to leave her unprotected so she gets what she deserves?

I think you are pushing the envelope a bit much here.

The majority of those of us who are not having our daughters vaccinated are making the decision based upon research.

I think the vaccine is a wonderful idea and could prove to be a great medical break through. However, I am not satisfied with the research done on girls that are still children in all sense of the word and that is where I draw the line in regard to the mandates.

In a few years, when she has actually reached adolescence, and there has been more study done, then we will discuss it. However, at the age of 11 I see absolutely no reason to subject her to it at this time, state mandate be damned.

52 posted on 08/26/2009 10:52:35 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
...state mandate be damned.

I do agree with you there.

55 posted on 08/26/2009 11:51:08 AM PDT by TChris (There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson