I’m stating that in close elections, the presence of a Libertarian only tends to serve that of the Democrats. Absent the presence of that one single Libertarian candidate in MT opposing Conrad Burns, it would’ve changed the outcome of power in the Senate. Did that one Libertarian candidate think he was doing the country a favor by putting the Democrats in charge ?
Considering the damage (perceived and real) the Republicans did to American freedom in the name of fear and security, perhaps the Libertarian figured the Dems couldn’t do much worse. Of course, what he got was a different flavor of crap.