Skip to comments.
MUST, -- MUST, -- READ --- FULLEST ANALYSIS SO FAR AS TO OBAMA BIRTH ELIGIBILITY STATUS
antimullah.com ^
| August 25, 2009
| STEPHAN TONCHEN
Posted on 08/25/2009 6:30:47 PM PDT by kellynla
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
"This Primer introduces and explains the Obama Eligibility Controversy, in question-and-answer format, for a non-technical general audience. We've double-checked the facts presented here, and we've cited the sources of each fact."
1
posted on
08/25/2009 6:30:47 PM PDT
by
kellynla
To: kellynla
2
posted on
08/25/2009 6:34:51 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: kellynla
GREAT!!!!
now if we can only gain “legal standing”.
3
posted on
08/25/2009 6:35:56 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: kellynla
Keep beating the drum...
The Failed Obama Administration©
4
posted on
08/25/2009 6:36:47 PM PDT
by
April Lexington
(Study the constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
To: Safrguns
Why on earth does not every single US citizen have ‘LEGAL STANDING’ to take this issue to court?
WHO DOES????? Do we just keep guessing and have the courts say “no, that’s not it....”
I think whichever judge made that ruling should be rode out of town on a rail...
5
posted on
08/25/2009 6:43:24 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(THIS ADMINISTRATION IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY DAMMIT DAMMIT DAMMIT!!!!!)
To: Mr. K
>>> I think whichever judge made that ruling should be rode out of town on a rail...
yeah.. that was sort of my point.
You just made it better.
6
posted on
08/25/2009 6:44:36 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: kellynla
Why would they let a little thing like the Constitution get in the way, when the Constitution is the exact thing they’re trying to destroy?
7
posted on
08/25/2009 6:45:19 PM PDT
by
Bullish
( Reality is the best cure for delusion.)
To: Safrguns
Oh...
And Major Cook proved it.
8
posted on
08/25/2009 6:45:34 PM PDT
by
Safrguns
To: kellynla
Should definitive proof arrive that Obama has been lying about his birth I think it will simply be something that will play out in the courts (over decades) ...it might even create sympathy for him
9
posted on
08/25/2009 6:48:04 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: kellynla
"With only two exceptions, every American President, who was born after 1787, was born in the United States, to parents who were both U.S. citizens. The two exceptions were Chester Arthur and Barack Obama." What would be the likely long range ramifications if an ineligible President has signed law or issued executive orders?
BTW- I believe John McCain was born outside the US to parents who were both citizens at the time. Not that it has any relevance to this case.
10
posted on
08/25/2009 6:50:29 PM PDT
by
doodles2
(Pigtails too tight)
"On September 8th, 2009, Federal Judge David O. Carter will begin hearing and "take to trial without procedrual impediments" the Obama birth matter filed by Orly Taitz in Santa Ana, California at 8 a.m. - so the ball will roll forward for the first time. Abama has hired new attorneys to conduct the case on his behalf. Again, adding to his spending of around $1 MILLION so far, to prevent the eligibility case being heard anywhere by any court."
11
posted on
08/25/2009 6:51:00 PM PDT
by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: woofie
If his entire career has been a lying fraud, that will create sympathy for him. That’s a little hard to follow.
12
posted on
08/25/2009 6:52:26 PM PDT
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: Safrguns
Why does not Colonel Hollister have legal standing?
13
posted on
08/25/2009 6:53:23 PM PDT
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: Safrguns
Why do the plaintiffs in the Santa Ana case brought by Taitz not have legal standing?
14
posted on
08/25/2009 6:54:18 PM PDT
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
To: kellynla
Even if true that Obama should not have taken office because of his birth, the insult to injury would still be . That there still is no leagal way united states citizens can remove such a president after they take office.
To: AmericanVictory
look at Bill Clinton .......its just about sex ...this is something Obama had no control over...granted the lying is the heart of the matter but all he has to do is plead ignorance
16
posted on
08/25/2009 7:00:38 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: kellynla
I guess we are all "birthers" now. Best regards,
17
posted on
08/25/2009 7:07:27 PM PDT
by
Copernicus
(California Grandmother view on Gun Control http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=7CCB40F421ED4819)
To: wisconsin synod Lutheran
That there still is no leagal way united states citizens can remove such a president after they take office. In that, you are mistaken. The Constitution states, point blank, that upon finding a President ineligible, the Vice President becomes acting President. Period. No ifs, ands or buts.
The Constitution is the supreme law. Statutory law is inferior to the Constitution.
To: kellynla
“...if you were born in the United States and one of your parents was not a U.S. citizen when you were born, your natural born citizenship is in doubt.”
.
This “in doubt” statement will become another source of smoke and mirrors magic to keep the Joker in the WH. The only way to resolve this BC mess is for Congress to DEMAND that 0 fully identify himself once and for all.
Many feel betrayed when they see how Congress completely ignores to come up with an answer to this legitimate question that many Americans have raised for quite some time.
Sheesh, what is so difficult about getting to the truth?
19
posted on
08/25/2009 7:10:40 PM PDT
by
353FMG
To: kellynla
20
posted on
08/25/2009 7:13:37 PM PDT
by
silverleaf
(If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson