lol- demanding proof for hteir faith- Sciencve backs hte bible up without any manipulation contrary to the accusaitons being made agaisnt creationists- it’s only when you start twisting and contorting God’s word that the bible then ‘meshes with’ macroevolution- the convoluted means macroevolutionists go through to make hte bible mesh with hteir brand of macroevolution is just plain silly, and takes God’s word completely out of context, and redefines words- but then again, the desperation to prove the claim that the bible and science (and by science, we’re talkign the religious beleif that hte world is billions of years old, and man evovled from chemicals) can coexist make deceit a common practice
Btw- there are several theories about starlight and redshifts and other such problems in calculating how ‘old’ the light is- as well, the width of hte universe is a HUGE problem for macroevolutionists hwo glibbly dismiss it out of hand by concocting theories which rely on pure assumptions- As well, baraminology agrees with hte bible, but the hypothesis of common descent IGNORES the actual evidnece and goes WAY beyond hte facts by claiming somethign that has no scientific evidence to support- and God clearly said that HE breathed life into the NOSTRILS of man, and htat HE ‘looked around’ the garden for a suitable mate for Adam and found NONE, which is why He again had ot CREATE Woman- and htat htere was no death of the spirit BEFORE the fall of man (which would have been impossible, naturally speaking, IF man went htrough billions of years of evolution evolving from chemicals, or even evolving from ‘lower species’) but macroevos ingore this and glibbly dismiss is by taking God’s word out of context, redefining words, and claiming man still evolved so no- I’m afraid it’s not hte creationsits and ID scinetists who are twisting God’s word-
Are you claiming the stars are only a few light years away, or that the speed of light can be assumed to dynamically change to support the different sections of Genesis??? Which one of the alternative assumptions is made up by Darwinists (speed of light, or distance to stars) ?
BTW: How did Kangaroos get from Noah's Ark to Australia after the flood? Swim???