Posted on 08/23/2009 10:06:14 AM PDT by wagglebee
President Barack Obama has taken to a unique and possibly quite macabre strategy into the August recess. In speech after speech on the need for the federalizing control of a national health care system President Obama has taken to insulting the wrong people--physicians--but beyond that he has turned them into orated illustrations of terror. I believe in doing so he is demonstrating an unusual degree of deception to which he is willing to stoop, all for the cause of saying he did "something" about health care.
Roughly one month ago President Obama stated in a press conference from the White House, "So if you come in, and you've got a bad sore throat, or your child has a bad sore throat, or has repeated sore throats. The doctor may look at the reimbursement system, and say to himself, 'You know what, I make a heck of a lot more money if I take this kid's tonsils out.' Now that may be the right thing to do but I'd rather have that doctor making those decisions, just based on whether you really need your kids tonsils out, or whether it make just make more sense just to huh... change... huh... maybe they have allergies, maybe they have something else that would make a difference."
In one swipe he slanders thousands of the very best children's doctors and ears, nose, and throat specialists across the board. He does so with an assumption that those who practice medicine are driven by greed, and not the welfare of their patients. Yet let me ask you this, how many children's doctors do you know, or have you had for your family? In many cases across America one doctor has been the family pediatrician for two to three generations of children, and extended family, and friends of that family. In all honesty do you think such a reality would exist, if they were treating kids like clunkers that can be cashed in for parts?
Roughly two weeks ago President Obama at a townhall meeting said,
"Let's take the example of something like diabetes, one of uh... A disease that's sky-rocketing, partly because of huh... obesity. Partly because it is not treated... huh... as effectively... as it could be. Right now if we paid a family... If a family care physician, works with his or her patient, to help them lose weight, modify diet, monitors whether they are taking their medication in a timely fashion. They might get reimbursed a pittance. But if that same diabetic ends up getting their foot amputated, that's $30,000, $40,000, $50,000, immediately the surgeon is reimbursed."
There he was again with the profit motive. Only this time he was actually making the argument that the doctor would be so malevolent as to allow the diabetic in question to purposefully worsen the condition, just to cash in. I cannot repeat this strongly enough--his willingness to view doctors with such contempt and disrespect sickens me, as it should every medical practitioner in the nation. As best as I can tell there is no other industry that swears to the ideals of such a lofty vision as is found in the Hippocratic Oath. Yet in allegiance to such an oath is something lost on the man who placed his hand on a Bible and took one to uphold our liberties, freedoms, and responsibilities as outlined in the Constitution.
On this issue he was also factually wrong. And given the extreme amount of detail that goes into any Presidential proclamation, a safe wager would be to say, that he knew he was not speaking the truth. The matter of monetary reimbursement was publicly stated by the American Medical Association within 24 hours. No doctor ever receives even a $1000 for the amputation of a foot. They also do not receive it "immediately." The facts according to the AMA are that reimbursement for amputations are slow in coming and average between $500-$700.
And then there was of course his grandmother, who he implied during the campaign was a racist, whose very hip replacement surgery--fully covered by her own insurance plan--he questioned as to whether it was necessary or not, because of her pre-existing condition:
I dont know how much that hip replacement cost, Obama said in the interview. I would have paid out of pocket for that hip replacement just because shes my grandmother. Obama said, You just get into some very difficult moral issues when considering whether to give my grandmother, or everybody elses aging grandparents or parents, a hip replacement when theyre terminally ill. Thats where I think you just get into some very difficult moral issues.
So by his own thinking, and now admission, had it been left to a public option or single-payer Government-run plan, there is a strong possibility she would have been denied coverage for her hip replacement because of her pre-existing condition.
But wasn't that one of the massively huge problems his public option plan was supposed to prevent?
So is everyone else's granny supposed to die in misery with a crumbling, dysfunctional hip, just because they are sick with something else?
Is this the utopia that Obama's health care plan is supposed to usher in?
Does anyone besides me feel the least bit queasy that in order to convince us the President has to resort to illustrations of unnecessary amputations in order to show us the rightness of the need?
Does his confusion between $500 and $50,000 cause anyone else who is struggling with all their might to pay their bills to shudder at his clarity on the numbers in a system he wants to spend $3,000,000,000,000 on?
These are important questions, and I desperately hope that while he's living it up on Martha's Vineyard this week that he works in a little time to consider them, you know... In between the wine and cheese events...
God likes us more than we do.
He sounds like a nice boy. :)
He is ... he doesn’t spew!
An interesting thought.
Given the way we treat ourselves and each other, how could He not?
Love your tagline! Awf’n.
“Love your tagline! Awfn.”
I was overseas for a long time, and returned to find that ofTTTTTen was besetting me on all sides.
That pronunciation doesn’t even appear as an alternative in my 1950s Funk and Wagnell. It used to be the way you could tell people who had graduated from elementary school from those who hadn’t.
My mom is from Philadelphia; that’s why I gave it the “w”. Dad (Missourian) would say “aaaahf’n.” And “warsh.”
I’ve never been abroad more than a couple of weeks. Where did you live?
"My message is all about "reason." We haf ways to deal with people who do not listen to reason."
[POUNDS DESK] "Vee haf not called ACORN thugs to suppress za people,
not a single time, ever. [POUNDS] Such allegations are false. Vee chust vant to
collect money from campaign donors to make tings better (whispers 'for us')
".... smirks and exits.
THE TIDE IS TURNING-A TIDAL WAVE IS SWEEPING DEMS FROM OFFICE
TAKE HEED DEMORATS A Delaware State Senate seatreliably Democrat for forty years in a heavily Dem district- was just won by a Republican by an unbelievable thirty (yep, thats thirty) percentage points.
Japan.
“was just won by a Republican”
Special election?
Thus says The LORD: Pro 8:36 But he that sinneth against me wrongeth his own soul: all they that hate me love death.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.