Posted on 08/23/2009 7:07:04 AM PDT by maggief
As usual, Specter is just fluffing his own political nest. He is nothing but an opportunist and marble mouthed scumbag.
From your lips to God's ear!
And BTW...regarding your screen name and the Canadian flag you display....are you a Canadian who is no longer proud of that fact or a US Citizen/resident who no longer considers him/herself to be a Canadian?
Just curious.No need for you to answer if it's too personal a question.
Read the VHA handbook on Advanced Directives from July 2009 here.
http://www.ethics.va.gov/docs/policy/VHA_Handbook_1004-02_Advance_Care_Planning_20090702.pdf
f@%!@rs!!!! This is the most discusting thing I have read..They want outrage and they are going to get it. My hatred for the left has reached new levels! How dare they!
Here’s what I think about this whole end of life stuff. There is a place for it..it’s always been there. When the time comes where things are kinda bleak, you are always informed about hospice. At that time you are told everything there is to know by a nice person who is trained in hospice care. You are given lots of reading material. This is the way it should keep being done.
The first time I had a family member go through it, of course it was horrible.. but after you understand the hospice system, it is a Godsend and one of the best things the medical world has come up with in a very long time.
My point is that it has been working WHEN THE TIME IS RIGHT. And the doctors and the patients know when the time is. To have a manual handed to you when the time isn’t right, just is pure control and suggestion and I am not for it.
his experience as a prosecutor; I now have no respect whatsoever for the slug.
Any respect I had for him went out the window as I watched him Chair the Ruby Ridge hearings on the murder of Randy Weavers wife by Lon Horiuchi while she held their infant in her arms, looking out the door of their home.
"I was not surprised to learn that the VA panel of experts that sought to update "Your Life, Your Choices" between 2007-2008 did not include any representatives of faith groups or disability rights advocates. And as you might guess, only one organization was listed in the new version as a resource on advance directives: the Hemlock Society (now euphemistically known as "Compassion and Choices")."
From:
(no link)
End-of-life questions grow more complex
Anchorage Daily News (AK) - Tuesday, April 17, 2001
Author: Ann Potempa Anchorage Daily News ; Staff
EXCERPT
Dr. Robert Pearlman, a professor at the University of Washington School of Medicine, talked about an ethical dilemma that could affect any Alaska resident or physician. When patients become sick or injured and cannot speak for themselves, physicians and family members are left in the confusing position of not knowing how to treat them. They question the patient’s quality of life, Pearlman said: ‘’Is this what Grandmother would have wanted?’’
New technology enables patients to stay alive longer. But how would they feel about machines keeping the body running when the mind isn’t?
Health workers have been asking patients to fill out ‘’advanced directives,’’ any legal or informal form, such as a living will, that allows people to specify how they wish to be treated if they are ever in a situation where they cannot speak for themselves.
A ‘’living will,’’ which takes effect while the person is alive but unable to communicate, concentrates only on care decisions. (A regular will takes effect after death and deals with estate and property concerns.) Directives also can establish a power of attorney, someone who will make decisions for patients when patients can’t make them on their own.
Pearlman told the audience about studies and statistics that showed that, even with advanced directives, there’s still a lot of inconsistency between what patients want and how they are treated. Part of that inconsistency comes from how little many people know about planning ahead.
‘’No one taught us how to do it,’’ Pearlman said. ‘’They didn’t tell us when to discuss it.’’
People facing certain health risks, such as dementia or terminal illness, should consider planning ahead, Pearlman said, to determine for themselves how they want to be treated later in life. Planning minimizes potential conflicts between family members and physicians. It also reduces the chance that a patient will be given too little or too much treatment.
Pearlman said the terms used in advanced directives can be misunderstood. People often say they don’t want to end up as ‘’a vegetable.’’ But can these people say what that means to them? The same goes for coma. Pearlman said he asked a number of people what ‘’coma’’ meant to them, and they gave him a variety of definitions.
‘’What we want is a shared understanding of terms,’’ he said.
Pearlman and his colleagues have created a 50-page booklet that helps people think about how they want to be treated if they face dementia, a stroke or other health problem. The booklet, ‘’ Your Life, Your Choices ,’’ asks such specific questions as: If you needed CPR, a feeding tube or a ventilator to live, would you want it? Would you rather die naturally and not have the treatment? Or do you not know how to answer this question yet?
‘’ Your Life, Your Choices ‘’ can be downloaded free from the Web site www.va.gov/resdev/programs/hsrd/ylyc.htm.
The Aging Whore
WEaver was a nut, but what happened at Ruby Ridge was unconscionable. Those FBI agents should have gotten “life” for what they did...same thing for what happened in Waco. Reno should have gone down for that massacre.
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000003193714
WALLACE: For the Obama administration’s response, we’re joined now by Tammy Duckworth, an assistant secretary at the V.A. who knows all about veterans issues. She lost both legs during a mission as a helicopter pilot in Iraq.
And, Secretary Duckworth, welcome to “FOX News Sunday.”
DUCKWORTH: Thanks for having me on, Chris.
WALLACE: I want to ask you about the worksheet, page 21 in the V.A. booklet. You’re a hero who, despite severe injuries, lives a full life, but you have to get around some of the time in a wheelchair yourself.
Do you have any problem with the V.A. asking elderly veterans whether life is worth living if they have a disability, if they live in a nursing home, if they’re unable to shake the blues?
DUCKWORTH: Well, I have to say, Chris, that this is a really important discussion because when I was in Iraq and I was injured, thank goodness I had an advanced directive, that I had both a living will and a medical power of attorney that my husband was able to use to really execute my wishes.
And I don’t think that anybody values life more than somebody such as myself or those of us who work at V.A. who’ve been in combat, who knows what it’s like to be given a second choice.
I think that any worksheet that any veteran wants to use that helps him make those decisions in advance for his family members so that they know what your wishes are, that you do want your life prolonged, that you do want to be resuscitated — those are all important.
And V.A. is very happy for veterans to use any booklet that they would like. This booklet was used throughout the Bush administration under two secretaries. But if veterans want to go out and — and we provide it free of charge. There are many other free-of-charge booklets that are out there.
If they want to go and spend $5 apiece and buy Mr. Towey’s book, they are welcome to do that. And that all falls under V.A.’s advanced directive policy which was...
WALLACE: But — but...
DUCKWORTH: ... put in place by President Bush.
WALLACE: ... if — if I — if I may, Ms. Duckworth, because we have limited time here...
DUCKWORTH: Sure. WALLACE: ... why would a question — I can understand questions about if you’re in an irreversible coma, do you want us to pull the plug. But why — as I asked Mr. Towey, why would you even have a question in a — in an end-of-life counseling book about if you’re in a wheelchair, if you’re living in a nursing home, does that make life worth living?
DUCKWORTH: Well, I know that before I was injured, I certainly let my husband know that, you know, being in a wheelchair was something that I feared and I was afraid for, but that I also wanted my life prolonged.
This is a tool. This is a simple tool that was put into place, as I said, under Secretary Nicholson. It was something that was used throughout.
And let me make a correction. We’ve not used it since 2007 when, under the Bush administration, we decided to go ahead and revise it.
This checklist is still under revision on a timetable according to a program that was actually decided on under the previous administration, because I know that President Bush and Secretary Nicholson and Secretary Peake all valued life. And that’s what we’re doing is we’re revising it.
WALLACE: But — but ...
DUCKWORTH: It will be out in 2010. It’s not yet out. So Mr. Towey was not correct.
WALLACE: That’s a — Secretary Duckworth...
DUCKWORTH: Yeah.
WALLACE: ... that’s just not true. The VHA put out a directive on July 2nd, 2009, and I want to put up two pages from that directive. The first one, page 8, “Primary care practitioners are responsible for giving patients pertinent educational materials, e.g. refer patients to the ‘Your Life, Your Choices’ module.”
And on page 9 it says, “If they request more information, patients may be directed to the exercises in ‘Your Life, Your Choices.’”
So as of July 2nd, 2009, last month, more than a month ago, V.A. health practitioners were told to refer all veterans, not just end-of- life veterans but all 24 million veterans, to this document, “Your Life, Your Choices.”
DUCKWORTH: Let me make a correction there, Chris. What our practitioners were told is to refer patients to any type of a tool. They can use Mr. Towey’s if they want to spend the $5 apiece.
V.A. simply was not willing to buy his booklet at $5 per veteran at the time. This is a decision that was made...
WALLACE: But — but how do you explain...
DUCKWORTH: ... by the previous administration.
WALLACE: It doesn’t — it doesn’t say give them — give them access to anything. I mean, in the specific V.A. booklet — it’s only 15 pages long — it specifically refers to this booklet twice.
DUCKWORTH: The only directive that is out there is actually left over from — I believe it was the beginning of 2007, which our advanced planning directive put into place, and it is actually very clear in saying that we need to provide veterans with information that they can make on how they want their care.
You know, this ultimately is about the care and health care for veterans, and we’re actually expanding benefits for veterans. We’re actually trying to get more priority aid veterans to sign up for V.A. benefits. We estimate that there’ll be another 500,000 veterans coming in for benefits.
We are expanding V.A. benefits to veterans. It is in our best interest to make sure that every veteran out there receives the care and access to the treatments and everything that he needs, because, after all, these are the men and women who fought for us and fought — and they deserve nothing less than the best care.
WALLACE: Secretary — well, we certainly agree on that. Secretary Duckworth, when you look at the workbook now on your Web site, as you point out, there’s a disclaimer there. We’re going to put the disclaimer that is now on the Web site if you go to the — to the “Your Life, Your Choices” link.
And it says, “The document is currently undergoing revision for release in V.A. The revised version will be available soon.” But when the V.A. first reinstated the document a month ago — six weeks ago...
DUCKWORTH: No.
WALLACE: ... it sent veterans directly there, as you can see in the screen grab. I guess the question I have is why, Secretary Duckworth, did the disclaimer about the book only appear this week after Mr. Towey’s article appeared in the Wall Street Journal?
DUCKWORTH: Actually, that disclaimer has been there since 2007 when we pulled...
WALLACE: Well, it wasn’t — it wasn’t...
DUCKWORTH: ... when we pulled...
WALLACE: ... there before August 20th of — between July 20th — July 2nd and August 20th, the disclaimer was not on the Web site, because we checked. DUCKWORTH: Chris, the disclaimer has been at the beginning of the “Your Life, Your Choice” booklet since 2007 when the Bush administration decided to pull it off and revise it on an — on an established time schedule.
WALLACE: The record doesn’t show that.
DUCKWORTH: But it — you can go on the Web site now. We have many things on our Web site. They’re up there because they receive federal dollars. They’re public research grants. We have to keep them on our Web site.
But I will tell you that this booklet has not been in use. It was pulled off the shelves in 2007. We very clearly told all of our medical practitioners not to use it because it was under revision...
WALLACE: I don’t...
DUCKWORTH: ... and this is ultimately — again, let’s bring this back to...
WALLACE: Miss Duckworth, that just — Miss Duckworth, I don’t want to — I don’t want to argue with you, but — but the...
DUCKWORTH: Sure.
WALLACE: ... but the facts are that it wasn’t in use from 2007 until July 2nd of 2009 when, in the VHA handbook, you specifically reinstated it and specifically told health care practitioners to refer veterans to it.
DUCKWORTH: Chris, it has not been reinstated. Let me make it clear. The only advanced directive that we have is dated February of 2007. And it actually encourages veterans to use any type of tool or checklist they would like to.
There are many, many good ones out there. This “Your Life, Your Choice” is widely used out there, not just within V.A. There are many others that are out there. And veterans are free to use whatever they would like to use.
WALLACE: I — and let — let me — I mean, I...
DUCKWORTH: We just urge them to use some...
WALLACE: I just — I have a problem here. And too often on these shows we say one person said, and another person said.
Secretary Duckworth, I don’t know if we’re able in the control room to put up the first — the full screen of the VHA directive, but I’d like you to put up the first full screen, if you can.
In the VHA directive of July 2nd, 2009, it says the following on page 8, “Primary care practitioners are responsible for giving patients pertinent educational materials, e.g. refer patients to the ‘Your Life, Your Choices’ module.” I mean, it’s just there in black and white on the VHA directive of July 2nd.
DUCKWORTH: Chris, I — I’m sorry, I can’t see that on the monitor in here. I will tell you that I know for a fact that the only directive signed by Secretary Shinseki — I mean, signed by a V.A. secretary was actually signed by Secretary Nicholson, and it’s dated February of 2007.
What you’re looking at may not actually be a directive, so I — since I can’t see it...
WALLACE: Well, we’ll...
DUCKWORTH: ... I’d be happy to come back and discuss it with you, but let’s talk about what V.A. is trying to do.
We have the largest increase in our budget in over 30 years. We are going to be expanding access to veterans. We are working with the new G.I. bill for the 21st century. We are fighting to end homelessness. And we are doing quite a lot for veterans.
And I don’t think that there’s anybody that understands better the importance and value of life than those of us who have worn the uniform and faced combat.
WALLACE: I apologize. We’re running out of time.
DUCKWORTH: Oh, I’m sorry.
WALLACE: I want to ask you one last question. If you feel...
DUCKWORTH: Sure.
WALLACE: ... so strongly about the value of life, although the disclaimer is on there, this document, “Your Life, Your Choices,” is still on the V.A. Web site.
Secretary Duckworth, while it’s supposedly being revised, it’s still up there. Can you promise us that this will be taken down today?
DUCKWORTH: It is still up there with the disclaimer that it’s under revision and do not use it. It cannot...
WALLACE: It doesn’t say don’t use it.
DUCKWORTH: Let me, Chris...
WALLACE: But why have it up there at all? Why not just say...
DUCKWORTH: Chris...
WALLACE: ... we’re going to take it down?
DUCKWORTH: Because we are bound by federal law. It was developed with federal research grant monies, and most of our — all of our programs that were results of federal research grants are online for people to use for research purposes.
But we very clearly tell all of our veterans, “Please use any type of a tool that is most suitable for you and your loved ones,” and you can certainly — there are many great ones out there, including Mr. Towey’s, if they want to go spend the $5 for it apiece.
V.A. makes ours available for free. The checklist that we’re actually using is a completely different checklist from this one, because this one has been taken off for revision.
WALLACE: Well, it hasn’t been taken off. It’s being revised, but it’s still on the Web site.
Secretary Duckworth, we want to thank you. We want to thank you for giving us the V.A.’s response. And we also personally want to thank you for your service to our nation.
DUCKWORTH: It was my pleasure to be here. Thank you.
WALLACE: If you want to read the V.A. book for yourself, you’ll find a link at our blog, foxnewssunday.com. And we will stay on this story of end-of-life counseling for our veterans.
it would appear that Tammydearest is a LIAR:
Last year, bureaucrats at the VA’s National Center for Ethics in Health Care advocated a 52-page end-of-life planning document, “Your Life, Your Choices.” It was first published in 1997 and later promoted as the VA’s preferred living will throughout its vast network of hospitals and nursing homes. After the Bush White House took a look at how this document was treating complex health and moral issues, the VA suspended its use. Unfortunately, under President Obama, the VA has now resuscitated “Your Life, Your Choices.”
Who is the primary author of this workbook? Dr. Robert Pearlman, chief of ethics evaluation for the center, a man who in 1996 advocated for physician-assisted suicide in Vacco v. Quill before the U.S. Supreme Court and is known for his support of health-care rationing.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204683204574358590107981718.html
This is great. First Wallace made Duckworth look like an idiot (I’m a little sorry for her because she is a disabled veteran, but the poor woman is out of her depth.) Now, Ryan is running circles around Snarling Spincter.
Our electorate MUST get educated and quit falling for everything that is said instead of looking at all that is being done.
vaudine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.