“If he wants rebellion, then he’s going to get it. However, I’m not so sure that the military will back him up; he’s going to need their support to stay in power. Otherwise, he’s history.”
Exactly why Obama wants to keep the war in Afghanistan going amd the majority of our fighting troops stationed over there. With this great majority of the military overseas in Iraq, Afghanistan, other countries, and otherwise occupied, Obama doesn’t have to worry about them in a political sense back here in the U.S. Keep the military otherwise occupied and out of his hair and out of the country.
Meanwhile he does his dirty work back home on the domestic front. Wake up America. This guy is devious. As much as he would like to please his liberal base by bringing the troops home, this does not comport with his desire to keep them away from our shores lest they cause hum trouble back here. He can’t and won’t say this, but it’s why he is willing to go up against his base on this matter. Mark my words.
Obama wants a bloodless coup in his march towards socialism. The only troops he wants around are the domestic ones he creates through his use of SEIU and Acorn, etc., and his desire for a states-wide policing force as large as the army (his own brownshirts), although Obama will also push for the U.N. to establish its own military to use to put down internal insurrections in countries, including our own. The Manchurian candidate and his henchmen at work.
This is foolish, most states operate just like the fed/guv does. There is no money in their ‘’pension’’ fund the bucks went into the general fund and the ‘’pension’’ fund is just an IOU on the future revs. of the state. To all of a sudden treat the money as real and seperate from the states annual budget would bankrupt most states. I didn’t expect Peelosi to understand this.