ping
Thats a lot of footnotes
The people are going to perform the coup in 2010 and render the 2012 one unnecessary.
A US Marine vet speaks directly to his representative
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rRE5UK6NQU
A small county stages a large liberty gathering
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T7I34RkqJI
The Storm unleashed on America
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNhu-SuZes0
A Petition Drive for Constitutional Restoration
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=110770273356
...I expect that this is unlikely now...the Army is too multicultural...let’s say serious Reconquista broke out and the Texas National Guard was called in...there’s a real chance that hispanic guardsmen would go over or go home.
Bookmark
png
No coup necessary; DumBO will install himself as the dictator if he has his way.
Ping.
It would be far more to the point were this journal to outline the far more possible assembly of a US constitutional convention. The US military would be essential in protecting that convention from interference by foreign intelligence and lobbyist operations, and attacks from fanatics and terrorists.
Even so, US military personnel would not be permitted into the perimeter surrounding the convention, nor would any other federal officer. Instead, were the convention to be held in Texas, a likely location, each individual State would be asked to send 2 delegates with a platoon of 30 “adult individuals of good character” as their security. A total of 1500 Americans who would guard the convention within the perimeter.
Outside the perimeter would be directly guarded by the Texas State Police and the Texas Rangers, but not the National Guard. Outside of their area, the US military would protect and defend the convention against those who would interfere with it.
All involved would be sworn to uphold and defend the convention. And the convention would have to be seated until 3/4ths of the individual States have voted in favor of the new constitution, and those changes carried out. Any federal officer who refused to obey the convention’s directives could be removed from officer after that, with a simple majority vote.
Once this was done, as a final act, the convention would sit in judgment of anyone who attempted to inappropriately interfere, monitor, or otherwise influence the convention. The judgment of these trials could not be appealed.
This has been posted a couple of years ago but
good to see it again.
Bump.
t.
Wow! In fact Parameters had exactly such an article about...11 years ago, I believe.
This might be the same author, in fact, although this is new.
bump
The page the lead article link leads to has been removed! How very convenient.