Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockerbie Bomber: Lord Mandelson Faces New Questions Over Libya Links (Trade for Oil, Gas)
The Telegraph ^ | 22 Aug 2009 | Andrew Alderson, Patrick Hennessy and Colin Freeman

Posted on 08/22/2009 1:45:25 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Lord Mandelson faced fresh questions over his links to Libya last night following the decision to free the Lockerbie bomber.

The Business Secretary denied that the Government had done a deal to free Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi, who was convicted of the 1988 terrorist atrocity that claimed 270 lives. However, his claims were contradicted by Saif Gaddafi, the son of the Libyan leader, in a conversation with Megrahi as the pair flew home from Glasgow.

In a transcript obtained by The Sunday Telegraph, Mr Gaddafi tells Megrahi: “You were on the table in all commercial, oil and gas agreements that we supervised in that period. You were on the table in all British interests when it came to Libya, and I personally supervised this matter. Also, during the visits of the previous prime minister, Tony Blair.”

This latest contradiction of the Government’s line will further increase tensions between Britain and the United States, which continued yesterday to express anger over the decision to free Megrahi. Robert Mueller, the FBI director, made public a hard-hitting letter he sent to Kenny MacAskill, the Scottish justice secretary who ordered the release. Mr Mueller called the decision inexplicable and detrimental to justice, adding: “Indeed your action makes a mockery of the rule of law. Your action gives comfort to terrorists around the world.” Downing Street confirmed last night that Gordon Brown had discussed the possible release of Megrahi with Colonel Gaddafi when the two men met on the fringes of the G8 summit in Italy last month. A letter the Prime Minister sent to the Libyans, dated last Thursday, the day of the release, said: SNIP

“The evidence is mounting that there was far more to the release of Megrahi than simply a judicial decision based on compassion,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: gaddafi; libya; lockerbie; lordmandelson; mandelson; megrahi; petermandelson; terrorism; unitedkingdom
Read the whole thing. There was a lot I couldn't fit into the excerpt.
1 posted on 08/22/2009 1:45:25 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Who makes a deal for a dying man? The Libyans are the ones that got taken. They should have planted some sort of dissolving Ricin pellet inside the creep.
2 posted on 08/22/2009 1:56:21 PM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I’d expect the SNP Scottish Executive to be involved with something like this, but if the Labour Government is involved then the Tories need to hit both of them hard. Releasing a murderer for a financial deal is dirty.

If true, then this needs to be campaign issue against both involved parties in the General Election next spring. If handle right, both the SNP and Labour should be handed their heads by the voters.


3 posted on 08/22/2009 2:09:30 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Jimmy Carter".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

They said that was </I>part</I> of the deal, anyway. But don’t underestimate the bragging rights and PR victory over the West this is.


4 posted on 08/22/2009 2:16:16 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The justice department could have stopped this and they didn’t. We have charges pending against this man. No way Mueller didn’t know about this. Feigned outrage to cover their a$$es and they hope you never find out what really happened.


5 posted on 08/22/2009 2:16:42 PM PDT by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

If young people are willing to kill themselves in acts of terrorism, then how willing would someone who is going to meet his maker soon be?


6 posted on 08/22/2009 2:17:20 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sirjohn

Our outrage shouldn’t be with the Brits, it should be with the justice department and the president. They could have stopped this but they chose not to. Wise up folks, you’re taking the bait.


7 posted on 08/22/2009 2:18:48 PM PDT by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill

“Who makes a deal for a dying man? “

Precisely. Money deals get done for money. This was a political deal.

“The Libyans are the ones that got taken. “

B.S. This is a smoke screen.


8 posted on 08/22/2009 2:21:42 PM PDT by sirjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BallyBill
I suppose the next question should be “does he really have terminal cancer?
9 posted on 08/22/2009 2:25:03 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Of course he has terminal cancer. The authorities who released him have assured us of this. /s
10 posted on 08/22/2009 2:29:20 PM PDT by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: behzinlea
Of course he has terminal cancer. The authorities who released him have assured us of this. /s

Yep. Just like Magic Johnson has assured us that he's been HIV positive for 18 years (but has never reportedly suffered from any symptoms.)

11 posted on 08/22/2009 2:49:32 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century. I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If Mandelbum is involved it’s dirty and devious. Always.


12 posted on 08/22/2009 4:15:38 PM PDT by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirjohn

You know how obama feels about Muslims, his buds, and how much he loves/hates the citizens of the United States. Somehow obama must have ok’d the Lybian deal by keeping silent..his interest in forming good relationships with Muslims is most important to him. OR, Britain/Scotland applied the “big payback” to ob for his dissing/disrespect of the UK and his lack of support. OR, ob won favor with the UK by being silent, and he won favor with the Lybian muslims by saying nothing...until after the fact. Not to mention if he got something further out of the deal..IMHO.


13 posted on 08/22/2009 6:31:20 PM PDT by itssme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson