Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace
Ah well, yours seems an incapacious obduracy ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_option#Other_uses_of_.22nuclear_option.22

Other uses of "nuclear option"

Beyond the specific context of U.S. federal judicial appointments, the term "nuclear option" has come to be used generically for a procedural maneuver with potentially serious consequences, to be used as a last resort to overcome political opposition.

In a recent legal ruling on the validity of the Hunting Act 2004 (Jackson and others v. Her Majesty's Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56, 13 October 2005), the UK House of Lords used "nuclear option" to describe the possibility of creating hundreds of new Liberal peers, which the government threatened to do in order to force the Tory-dominated Lords to accept the Great Reform Act of 1832.

16 posted on 08/26/2009 9:18:12 AM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: dodger

Reconciliation has been used a number of times in the past, and nothing blew up or was incinerated. Still, you insist on calling it the nuclear option.

Well, if that floats your boat, paddle on. But do so without me.


18 posted on 08/26/2009 9:46:52 AM PDT by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson