Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Dakota approves air permit for controversial oil refinery
Journal Star ^ | August 21, 2009 | Dave Dreeszen

Posted on 08/21/2009 2:48:01 PM PDT by decimon

PIERRE, S.D. - The South Dakota Board of Minerals and Environment voted unanimously Thursday to approve an air quality permit for the proposed Hyperion Center, which would be the first new oil refinery built in the United States since 1976.

The long-awaited decision moves the Dallas, Texas-based Hyperion a major step closer to starting construction in rural Union County.

The location is in extreme southeast South Dakota, across the Missouri River from Nebraska and near the border with Iowa. The nearest Nebraska towns are Newcastle and Ponca.

Hyperion executive Preston Phillips said the permit allows the firm to proceed with contingency plans that include securing a source of crude oil from Alberta, Canada, lining up construction contracts and solidifying commitments from investors for the $10 billion project, which would be one of the largest private investments in U.S. history.

Opponents are expected to fight the decision in court.

(Excerpt) Read more at journalstar.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: energy; hyperion; oilrefinery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2009 2:48:01 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon

I believe this was the one that was planned in Kansas until the almight Sebelius vetoed two coal power plants for glo-bull warming reasons and decided to abandon the state.


2 posted on 08/21/2009 3:01:24 PM PDT by Crazieman (Feb 7, 2008 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1966675/posts?page=28#28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

The question remains, will the refinery use petroleum from the Bakken Shale of North Dakota/Montana, or is it devoted exclusively to oil from Canada’s tar sands region?


3 posted on 08/21/2009 3:09:06 PM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melchior
The question remains, will the refinery use petroleum from the Bakken Shale of North Dakota/Montana, or is it devoted exclusively to oil from Canada’s tar sands region?

Is there a pipeline east from Bakken? Don't think so but I don't know.

4 posted on 08/21/2009 3:12:31 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

While motoring across Montana one month ago, at a Rest Stop on I-94, I spoke with a woman who told me her husband was working on a pipeline being laid across eastern Montana into SoDak, to bring Canadian oil into SoDak. She was driving to meet him, with their twin children.


5 posted on 08/21/2009 3:31:34 PM PDT by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

Whether it will get its feedstock from tar sands or Bakken will greatly determine the design of the crude units. Tar sands feedstock is high sulfur content, requiring sulfur recovery units. The sulfur is a byproduct sold to chemical and rubber plants, so there is a revenue stream from that. It also requires some higher metallurgy.


6 posted on 08/21/2009 3:44:31 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (From this point forward the Democratic Party will be referred to as the Communist Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Elsiejay
...I spoke with a woman who told me her husband was working on a pipeline being laid across eastern Montana into SoDak, to bring Canadian oil into SoDak.

Canadian oil. Could be from the Canadian part of the Bakken field but that's not North Dakota/Montana.

7 posted on 08/21/2009 3:45:00 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: decimon

This ain’t over. The enviro-wackos are well-funded, and they will try to tie this up in court indefinitely. I hope they fail and free enterprise (what’s left of it) wins.


8 posted on 08/21/2009 3:50:47 PM PDT by webschooner (First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win -- Mahatma Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

I could have sworn that the refinery was to be built on an Indian reservation. As I recall, the Indian tribes were all for it because it would bring some two thousand jobs to the impoverished region.


9 posted on 08/21/2009 3:55:55 PM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Melchior

That would be good — maybe that will put a few legal wrinkles into the enviro-wackos lawsuit plans.

There were plans for a refinery here in Arizona several years ago, but haven’t heard anything about it for a couple of years. I suppose the enviro-wackos won out.


10 posted on 08/21/2009 4:01:23 PM PDT by webschooner (First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win -- Mahatma Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

If the whackos win, I guess we could just refine the oil in Alberta and ship you the finished product. An environmentalist win means more jobs and prosperity in Canada. Woo-hoo.


11 posted on 08/21/2009 4:04:57 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Eventually, when almost all jobs in the US are outsourced, because virtually no economic activity is allowed here, then there eventually won’t be anymore money in the US (that’s worth anything) to buy things with.

At that point, the US becomes a washed up turd world cesspool, ignored by the rest of the world.


12 posted on 08/21/2009 4:09:25 PM PDT by webschooner (First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win -- Mahatma Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: webschooner

Your country is tying itself in knots on the alter of environmentalism and political correctness. You have a racist president for the first time since LBJ, and no one will say so because he is black. He is eviscerating the country. I fear they will be nothing left.


13 posted on 08/21/2009 4:11:52 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name now that we have the most conservative government in the world?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
You might be interested in this: Petrobank and Tristar become PetroBakken (light oil, in situ conversion to light oil).
14 posted on 08/21/2009 4:20:13 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Maybe Sarah Palin can submit a “friend of the court” paper?


15 posted on 08/21/2009 4:24:14 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated
Maybe Sarah Palin can submit a “friend of the court” paper?

Amicus Sariae.

16 posted on 08/21/2009 4:37:57 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Melchior; decimon; Fred Hayek
The question remains, will the refinery use petroleum from the Bakken Shale of North Dakota/Montana, or is it devoted exclusively to oil from Canada’s tar sands region?

From deeper inside the article: Hyperion's lead attorney highlighted the state-of-the-art pollution control technology for the refinery, which would process 400,000 barrels of Canadian tar sands crude per day into low-sulfur gas, diesel and jet fuel.

17 posted on 08/21/2009 4:58:30 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The mob got President Barabbas; America got shafted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

bttt


18 posted on 08/21/2009 5:17:23 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

The cite elicited some comments that seemed to imply that the Bakken was “hot air”. That is incredibly far from the truth. Big players like EOG are hard at work on the Bakken, and little players like KOG with large acreage holdings have had success and are a tempting target for the big guys. Recent posts on FR have indicated that the Bakken is the largest strike since the Alaska find of three decades ago. The problem, it seems to me, is getting the oil to the refinery.


19 posted on 08/22/2009 6:24:49 AM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Melchior; junta
The cite elicited some comments that seemed to imply that the Bakken was “hot air”.

I think that comment was about the company, PetroBakken. The commenter did not justify the hot air claim.

20 posted on 08/22/2009 6:33:17 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson