Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Health Care Reform Without Legal Reform (Sarah Palin)
Facebook ^ | 8/21/09 | Sarah Palin

Posted on 08/21/2009 7:14:29 AM PDT by DogBarkTree

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-326 next last
To: r9etb

You are so missing the point...!


21 posted on 08/21/2009 8:09:23 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree; 2nd Amendment; andy58-in-nh; Arizona Carolyn; Bishop_Malachi; CharterOakie; ...

Sensible Sarah ping!


22 posted on 08/21/2009 8:10:10 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz
No. It was an ad hominem attack accusing me (and a few others) of supporting Romney. Here's the telling line..

"You bots stay on that cruise to ambivalence aboard the SS Romney 2012"

Some people who have blind devotion for a particular candidate can't quite grasp the fact that criticism of their "hero" is just that criticism, and not the work of some secret Romney cabal.

23 posted on 08/21/2009 8:11:37 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: maryz; OldDeckHand
think the comment you took as accusing you of supporting Romney was a general comment on the article, not an ad hominem attack.

You'd be wrong about that. The comment in question was a case of cross-thread stalking, directed to those of us who are unimpressed by Sarah Palin's qualifications.

For some reason, there's a group of morons who equate "unimpressed with Palin" with "Romney supporter." Their behavior is, unfortunately, a good example of the current state of political discourse at FR and elsewhere.

24 posted on 08/21/2009 8:11:50 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
You are so missing the point...!

Which is....?

25 posted on 08/21/2009 8:13:05 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 0scill8r
"She’s got some mighty rhetorical fists!"

And those that say "she's no Reagan" are going to be eating their tongues involuntarily!

26 posted on 08/21/2009 8:13:22 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

She reminds me a little (I don’t mean to be blasphemous) of John writing from the Isle of Patmos. She’s probably holed-up writing from a cabin in Talkeetna by Coleman lantern, zapping out things like “tort reform”, “death panel”, etc. And all the “king’s” men in their pin-stripe suits can’t counter her. HAHAHA


27 posted on 08/21/2009 8:14:33 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; OldDeckHand

Well, I’d ask how someone (moonbats excepted, of course) can accuse anyone of anything without actual evidence . . . but the dewpoint here is 74 right now and so I probably wouldn’t be able to grasp the answer . . . :(


28 posted on 08/21/2009 8:15:16 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: johncocktoasten
"You bots stay on that cruise to ambivalence aboard the SS Romney 2012"

Sean Hannity is aboard (main deck men's room Valet)

29 posted on 08/21/2009 8:16:50 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; r9etb
VR-I agree, r9 missed the point. LOL! I do that myself, often!

I so agree that she strikes like a viper going after prey, and hits it home because of her clarity and because she is not beholden to anybody. I LOVE IT!

Her paragraph about the percentage of doctors who are sued is JUST HORRIFIC.

And with NO TORT REFORM in 1000 pages, who is going to control what universal health care costs all of us, are our tax dollars going to used to pay off lawyers and health care goes into the tank?

ALready posted under thread about tort reform...she has a killer paragraph in her writing about the percentage of doctors who are sued each year in specialty practices (not even including family practice or internists). Something like ONE HALF of all neurosurgeons are sued EACH YEAR. CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT? And ONE THIRD of ALL orthopaedic surgeons, ONE THIRD of all EMERGENCY ROOM DOCTORS are SUED EACH YEAR!!!!!!!!!! EACH YEAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And those arseholes in DC did NOT INCLUDE TORT REFORM, or LEGAL REFORM in any of the ONE THOUSAND PAGES of their COMMUNIST HEALTH CARE MANIFESTO....NOT ONE SENTENCE IS DEVOTED TO REFORMING THE HORRIFIC FRIVOLOUS LAWSUITS THAT HAVE CAUSED MEDICAL COSTS TO SKYROCKET.

Rant/ off

30 posted on 08/21/2009 8:17:40 AM PDT by Republic (TORT REFORM....real reform...what are you waiting for democrats? Scared? lol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: maryz; OldDeckHand

Precisely,

OldDeckHand and I have been engaged in numerous conversations on the Palin topic. I know that he is not a Romney bot, but I wanted to include him in the conversation because he has reservations about Palin’s policy accumen. Steve-b and Reaganaut on the other hand, are definitely romney-bots, with Steve-b leading his own personal crusade to post every single specious lie and rumor about Sarah Palin that he can find. I also resent the implication that support for Palin is worship. I worship the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. My support for Palin is because she represent the charisma, character, and will to do to this government what needs to be done. Pare it down, restore it to its Constitution bounds, and get it out of this Politically Correct/devoid of Common Sense policy making mentality.

EVERYONE else I see on our side is a go with the flow person who just wants some small changes to programs and tax policy.


31 posted on 08/21/2009 8:19:57 AM PDT by johncocktoasten (Practicing asymetrical thread warfare against anti-Palin Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
And those that say "she's no Reagan" are going to be eating their tongues involuntarily!

She's no Reagan.

Consider this little nugget, which perhaps slipped past you:

Dr. Weinstein’s research shows that around $200 billion per year could be saved with legal reform. That’s real savings. That’s money that could be used to build roads, schools, or hospitals.

That merits a bit of attention: what she's saying is ... that's $200 billion that the government could use in other ways. It's still not your money.

Does Sarah Palin really mean that? Who knows -- perhaps she only meant it as a throw-away sympathy grabber.

But the thought process underlying the point was either careless (which is not Reaganesque), or deliberate (which is not conservative).

My money is on "careless." That's precisely the sort of thing that demonstrates Sarah Palin's unreadiness for the big time.

She's quite obviously trying to sound "intellectual" with pieces like this. But she needs 10 years of practice and effort to make it stick.

32 posted on 08/21/2009 8:23:50 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
"She’s probably holed-up writing from a cabin in Talkeetna by Coleman lantern, zapping out things like “tort reform”, “death panel”, etc. And all the “king’s” men in their pin-stripe suits can’t counter her."

You've deftly painted the picture of the burr under the RINO's saddle!

33 posted on 08/21/2009 8:24:47 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Republic
she has a killer paragraph in her writing about the percentage of doctors who are sued each year in specialty practices

Note: she didn't write that paragraph. She's quoting somebody else's work.

It's nice that Ms. Palin is doing a little research -- or somebody is doing it for her -- but let's not pretend that she's offering anything that we haven't read before.

34 posted on 08/21/2009 8:29:14 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"That merits a bit of attention: what she's saying is ... that's $200 billion that the government could use in other ways. It's still not your money."

Perhaps you have prismatic vision? - Her point is that the $200 billion is being siphoned out of the available kitty, thus depriving the taxpayers while rewarding the destroyers. We've already paid the taxes; the issue is where it has gone. The Gingriches, Lotts, and Lugars that continually thwarted tort reform in the congress are the ones you should be directing your anger towards.

35 posted on 08/21/2009 8:31:22 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

That’s ok. Sarah has Rush. Hannity can have all of his fawning hot and bothered housewives calling in.

Sean Hannity Show Format:

3:00-3:15PM- Ruth’s Chris ad, Plug Hannity Concert, Plug Tonite’s Hannity Show

3:15-3:20PM- Commercial Break

3:20-3:30PM- Interview to Dick Morris

3:30-3:35PM- Commerical Break

3:35-3:45PM- Take calls from Hot and Bothered Housewives

3:45-3:50PM- Commerical Break

3:50-4:00PM- Repeat plugs for Hannity, Ruths’ Chris, and the Hannity Concerts

Next two hours, repeat first hour.

I love that Sean is passionate about our cause. But I am living in fear of the day that Rush Can’t carry on his show any longer. Sean is the heir apparent, and I just can’t listen to him. But for now, there is Rush, and there is everyone else. Rush is in Sarah’s camp and everyone else will be too come July of 2012


36 posted on 08/21/2009 8:31:27 AM PDT by johncocktoasten (Practicing asymetrical thread warfare against anti-Palin Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: johncocktoasten
Sorry, John. Perhaps you didn't mean to be dishonest, but you stalked us cross-thread, and you called us all 'bots.

Don't try to weasel out of it. Just apologize, and next time try to be more adult about inviting us to discuss something.

37 posted on 08/21/2009 8:31:59 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

When the ‘Bot’ fits, wear it!


38 posted on 08/21/2009 8:36:33 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

My President has spoken, and I support her.


39 posted on 08/21/2009 8:37:12 AM PDT by The Wizard (Democrat Party: a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

SINGLE PAYER NATIONALIZED LEGAL SERVICES FOR ALL! NOW!

Cap trial lawyers income and in kind compensation at $100,000 per year.


40 posted on 08/21/2009 8:38:42 AM PDT by listenhillary (We became community organizers and Obama and the Statists get p*ssed off at us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-326 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson