Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

That’s why I can’t take the “libertarian” position on drugs. Because we all know we would wind up footing the bill for treating these losers.


33 posted on 08/21/2009 6:38:59 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

From a purely cost standpoint I honestly don’t see how treatment programs would cost more than than the war on drugs.

Just think of the costs to house one prisoner, multiplied by the amount of prisoners in jail for minor drug offenses. Multiple police agencies who do nothing but drug busts. All of the associated court costs to process minor drug offenders.

The war on drugs has cost hundreds of billions of dollars and there is no evidence of any positive effect.

Personally I would legalize everything that can be grown naturally, and keep harsh penalties for manufacturing chemical drugs, aka meth and acid.


36 posted on 08/21/2009 7:10:08 AM PDT by kamikaze2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
“That’s why I can’t take the “libertarian” position on drugs. Because we all know we would wind up footing the bill for treating these losers.”

lol, that's the socialist position. Libertarians believe one should be responsible for ones-self, not ones neighbor. BTW taxes on drugs would make billions to be wasted by government, not only on drug treatment, but numerous other lame brained ideas. If you don't use drugs you wouldn't be paying for any of it. Heck it might even make your taxes go down although I wouldn't count on it. Government never lowers taxes, they just grow to absorb any new revenue stream.

88 posted on 08/21/2009 9:46:55 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson