When the sixties "revolution" proved futile through protests and force, those holding the values that were then called "radical" decided to change tactics and approach the revolution from the inside out.
Those schooled in Marxism, atheism, Alinsky-ism et al became the teachers, administrators, journalists and media programmers in order to manipulate the thinking of the next generation to believe their radical Humanist values were correct, and those on which the United States was built were evil and/or outdated.
Re-claiming America requires a similar commitment to a bottom-up counter revolution.
Whether we're up to it is yet to be determined.
As Obortion's mentor Saul Alinsky teaches, anger is a very useful emotion to tap into to stir up the masses. They then just need to point the mobs toward those they've been told to hate.
My question is are we sufficiently aroused by the bald faced lies and bullying Obortion personifies to do the hard work over a period of decades to restore this nation to sanity--when the vast majority of the world has bought into Humanist lies and we don't have the convenience of a malleable morality to suit the moment the way liberals do?
One thing is certain: It's certainly a noble enough cause to warrant the effort.
And I believe we'll be judged one day more for the intent of our hearts than our actual accomplishments in a dark and dying world.
The bad thing about behaving morally is that in the short run it requires a lot of discipline, self-control, and education toward gaining real wisdom.
It will always be easier to get people to want to hang out, hang loose, do some drugs, have some sex, slack off, etc.
There's no need for a Communist vanguard of crack propagandists to start such a movement going. All that our society needed to start sliding down the slippery slope of selfishness was the cultural permission to get on the slide.
I believe that our best tactic right now is to make sure that everyone and every organization has the right to promote specific beliefs. If the morally upright have a soap box in the public square then we can always be certain that we can get people to see the long term values of living a moral life.
If we are prevented from even sending out our message, then all that anyone will be hearing is the noise pouring out of the MSM.
Accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being a communist or marxist or whatever is not a good way to frame the message, and is a pretty good way of getting your soap box removed from the public square.