BTW I’m not a creation person. I simply don’t understand how this occurred. Instead of calling people dumb, you might simply explain the mechanism by which there is actual ink (or something that can be reconstituted) from a fossil that is millions of years old.
“Instead of calling people dumb, you might simply explain the mechanism by which there is actual ink (or something that can be reconstituted) from a fossil that is millions of years old.”
While they don’t specifically say so, one can imagine that the ink was fossilized at the same time, with the same “Medusa Effect” mentioned in the article.
I’m not calling everyone dumb, just the “creation science” folks on here that think a soft tissue fossil is soft tissue. What else can you call it?