I find it more than passing strange that there seems to be no updated carbon cycle diagram such as the one you have posted ad infinitum from 12 years ago; but, on a lighter note I’ve been reading Tom Fuller’s website for a couple of months and keep running across this guy in the ‘comments’ section:
[CBDunkerson says:
Logic tells me that the scale of conspiracy required to fake all the evidence that AGW is a serious problem, almost certain to exceed the ‘just 2 degrees’ scope you envision, cannot possibly exist.
Obama is NOT veering away from mainstream science. He’s just more up to date on what mainstream science is saying than you are;
www.ens-newswire.com/ens/sep2009/2009-09-25-02.asp
September 26, 4:14 AM]
Are you CBD or merely an alter ego?
Do a Google image search with the phrase "carbon cycle" and you'll see plenty; I just happen to like that one. One of the things that is a basic in the discussion is that these fluxes don't change much. If people don't understand the basic exchanges between reservoirs, they are going to have trouble with the subtleties.
Are you CBD or merely an alter ego?
I never heard of CBD or Tom Fuller, but the statement has been echoed many times. To believe in global concerted fakery of the scientific evidence for global warming requires such an acceptance of a stunning collusional ability of the scientific community that it threatens basic comprehension of reality itself.