[Danae]

A lot more at link with graphs.

[colorado tanker]

The link is great. The data are just devastating to the alarmists.

'Course, they still won't give up. Way too much money at stake, besides the chance they can seize control of the economy.

[Question_Assumptions]

Ping for later.

[PeterPrinciple]

“we now know that the effect of CO2 on temperature is small, we know why it is small, and we know that it is having very little effect on the climate.”

---

Repeat LOUD and OFTEN.....................

[maryz]

I heard Lindzen on a local (Boston) radio talk show. He was great!

One thing he said was that, as far as he can see, though some scientists jump on the AGW bandwagon, it's interesting that they only seem to really accept the garbage in other people's fields -- in their own fields, they stick to the facts.

[BlueNgold]

From the article:

Either way, the world has been the victim of some very bad science. The results of which can be seen in drastically reduced GDP in countries with the Cap and Trade laws in place, as well a a 5 - 10% decrease in standard of living for those citizens living there (Taxing Carbon designed to fail.), all with little or no effect on emissions globally.
(Emphasis mine)

But those crazies up at MIT don't know nuthin' bout no numbers or science, do they????

[Sergio]

Bookmark.

[stephenjohnbanker]

or....

Water vapor constitutes Earth’s most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth’s greenhouse effect (4). Interestingly, many ‘facts and figures’ regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.

Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC’s, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).

Human activities contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small— perhaps undetectable— effect on global climate.

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

[stephenjohnbanker]

Why should I believe some MIT Professor with a genius I.Q., when I have Algore??

[TigersEye]

bttt

[Waco]

Does this mean that the libs have been emiting all that CO2 for nothing? Quick libs, stop it! Now! Don’t let them’’ win.

[BuddhaBrown]

This only further demonstrates the success of the Cash for Clunkers program. Apparently, destroying working vehicles and giving away more taxpayer money which has been collected yet worked so well that it seems to have produced retroactive climate stability.

In other words, the AlGorist analysis of this information will result in a new chart that displays a positive relationship between increased deficit spending and decreased global temperatures.

[WOSG]

PING.
The science is settled.
Global warming is not a crisis, the models are wrong, and CO2 is not harmful.

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[AFreeBird]

B4L8r

[Old Professer]

Nevertheless, NOAA is poised to announce that 2009 was the warmest on record in just a few months, stay tuned.

[airborne]

Carbon dioxide not relevent?

Tell it to the trees!

8^)

[Repeal The 17th]

Lets just toss some virgins into a volcano and be done with it.

[Tzimisce]

For Later.

[CowboyJay]

Will Big Gay Al be required to give his Nobel back now that ManBearPig is dead?

[GOPJ]

Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT’s peer reviewed work states “we now know that the effect of CO2 on temperature is small, we know why it is small, and we know that it is having very little effect on the climate.”

MIT? Hey - this guy disagrees with dems... someone will turn him into the White House - doesn't he know that???