Most people on FR don’t have a clue what “tort reform” means either which is why they are all for it. “Tort reform” is one of the most anti-conservative ideas to come down the path in ages. Replacing an American jury of 12 ordinary citzens with what, a gov’t answer. Proponents of “tort reform” usually don’t know a thing about the law. Insurance companies, though, love it.
parsy, who says “eschew the simplistic answers”
Actually you seem to be at the wrong party. Your dogmas set here so far are merely recitations of Democrat party talking points, not thoughtful analysis of the facts.
So are you one of Free Republican original Moveon.org trolls? One of those people sent over by Moveon to spew Democrat talking points on Conservative Websites?
Your analysis of tort reform is completely divorced from all fact. Tort Reform merely caps damage awards to 3 times punitive damages. It does not "replace a jury" at all. That is pure Democrat Party/Trial Lawyer demagoguery.
I am curious. Do you even realize your aggressive stupidity is an evolutionarily regressive trait?