Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libsrscum

They tagged the missile.

Keeping enough laser on it steadily to burn it up, despite intervening clouds and any reflective/refractory coating on the missile itself, is another thing.


13 posted on 08/14/2009 11:05:12 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (When did it become the Democrat You-Shut-Up-And-Listen-To-Me Tour?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

It doesn’t take long to burn through the very thin-skinned missiles and destroy their aerodynamic integrity/warhead controls/flight controls and electronics.

“Dumb” single-stage/gravity-ballistic missiles like the Palistinian’s Katuska’s have also been routinely destroyed since the early 2000’s by the THEL and other laser versions.

The lasers are actually chemically-powered by some “complex” H2OH (etc) reactions. You don’t use electric power to create the beam, just mix the chemicals. Given enough liquid in the 747 tanks, it means you can’t run out of “anti-missile missiles” .

While not mid-air refueled now, such a reload capability could be provided by specialist tankers.


27 posted on 08/14/2009 11:41:45 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson