Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The State Worker: Numerous lawsuits fight California furloughs
SacBee: State Worker ^ | 8/13/9 | Jon Ortiz

Posted on 08/13/2009 7:50:01 AM PDT by SmithL

California's government is in a state of civil war. The battlegrounds: courtrooms from San Francisco to Sacramento. The fight: furloughs.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration spent $228,000 on furlough litigation as part of an eight-month contract that ended in June with Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, a Sacramento-based law firm.

"These legal costs wouldn't be so high if people weren't fighting the furloughs," said Lynelle Jolley, spokeswoman for Schwarzenegger's Department of Personnel Administration.

"That's ludicrous," said Yvonne Walker, president of Service Employees International Union Local 1000, which represents about 95,000 state workers. "What audacity, to blame the very people they're hurting with these furloughs."

Local 1000 has been a party in several furlough lawsuits. Its in-house lawyers have handled the litigation, so the union doesn't have a breakdown of its furlough lawsuit costs.

SEIU and several other state worker unions together and separately have launched at least a dozen furlough lawsuits in San Francisco, Alameda and Sacramento courts. All contend that Schwarzenegger's furloughs are either illegal pay cuts or are misapplied.

The current three-day furloughs reduce the pay of about 215,000 state workers by about 14 percent, so the lawsuits have millions of dollars at stake.

The governor won the first round in January when a Sacramento judge affirmed his furlough power. The unions have appealed.

On offense, the governor recently filed a lawsuit to keep the state engineers' union from seeking arbitration to settle whether furloughs breach their contract.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: attacklawyers; furloughs; goldenstate; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Let the unions reimburse the taxPAYers for the full legal costs of the lawsuits.
1 posted on 08/13/2009 7:50:03 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

There is going to be the time that the furloughs will turn into job losses. The money just ain’t there and they can’t keep going into debt.


2 posted on 08/13/2009 7:55:29 AM PDT by Loud Mime (Obama's Logo = barastika)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

SEIU represents 95,000 state workers!!! UNBELIEVABLE!! No wonder Hussein has no problem finding so many 6’4”, 270lb thugs in the SEIU membership!


3 posted on 08/13/2009 7:58:50 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The unions have contracts which were approved by the legislature. The emergency furloughs were upheld in previous curt challenges due to the absence of a budget.

The question for the courts now is whether one party to a contract - the emergency now having been resolved - can unilaterally change the terms of the contract.

4 posted on 08/13/2009 8:01:32 AM PDT by BenLurkin (What is so offensive about liberty that it must be "reformed" out of existence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I was furloughed last week for one week.

It’s better than the alternative.

These idiots are going to force the alternative.


5 posted on 08/13/2009 8:02:55 AM PDT by TSgt (I long for Norman Rockwell's America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF

Yeah, I’d rather take a few days off per month, versus looking for work.

At the very least, one can use the furlough time to look for a part time job to fill the gap, figure out how to cut back, or, look for another job.


6 posted on 08/13/2009 8:10:03 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Greed and envy is used by our political class to exploit the rich and poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Unions got Penna. to shelve the idea of furloughs by threatening to sue. We are getting dangerously close to the Judicial branch seizing power of the purse.


7 posted on 08/13/2009 8:36:06 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Call their bluff. Withdraw the furloughs and start laying people off.


8 posted on 08/13/2009 8:49:11 AM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yogafist

Call their bluff. Withdraw the furloughs and start laying people off

Call their bluff start firing ,not laying off.
These work furloughs are nothing compared to the pension debacle that is around the corner.
If Calif is anything like other states that have unfunded pension obligations, furloughs will be least of the worries that are coming.


9 posted on 08/13/2009 11:38:51 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson