Skip to comments.
Lockheed's F-35 may be flying into budget storm
Jim Wolf ^
| 8/12/09
| Reuters
Posted on 08/12/2009 5:58:25 PM PDT by Nachum
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Pentagon may want to consider scaling back Lockheed Martin Corp's multinational F-35 fighter program, the costliest-ever U.S. arms-purchase plan, as part of stepped-up budget belt-tightening, an analysis by an influential research group said.
The private Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, several of whose one-time experts are now serving in senior Obama administration jobs, cited the F-35 as just one example of programs ripe for review by the Department of Defense during its once-every-four-year, top-to-bottom re-assessment now under way.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budget; f35; flying; lockheeds; navair; savetheraptor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Ahhhh, now I get it. Kill the F-22 and then say we don't have enough money for the F-35 either.
1
posted on
08/12/2009 5:58:26 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
Exactly whose jobs is Obama’s administration saving?
I mean they have these numbers they cite about saving jobs, but everywhere I look their cuts are cutting jobs, their tax increases will but costing the economy jobs, and their stimulus spending is disappearing into the black hole of government mismanagement.
And people think these Liberals walk on water...
(To think people were depressed and miserable when there was full employment and wages were going up on their own. Now that they’re unemployed life is just peachy.)
2
posted on
08/12/2009 6:02:28 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: Nachum
Why is this a surprise? Check Davis Monthan, we might still have some SPADS in mothballs.
3
posted on
08/12/2009 6:08:38 PM PDT
by
pfflier
To: Nachum
Kill the F-22 and then say we don’t have enough money for the F-35 either.
By George, I believe you’ve got it.
4
posted on
08/12/2009 6:10:33 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Nachum
This just in: 0bamalamadingdong is calling for a 50% increase in military spending for spit balls.
5
posted on
08/12/2009 6:11:09 PM PDT
by
LiberConservative
(Earning a spot on 0bama's enemies list since 2008.)
To: Nachum
Somewhere, the Pukin dog is laughing more often these days...
6
posted on
08/12/2009 6:17:35 PM PDT
by
bill1952
(Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: LiberConservative
What is the binding agent in the spitball?
I heard it was ACORN dust.
7
posted on
08/12/2009 6:18:45 PM PDT
by
pointsal
To: Nachum
Bingo. Who needs fighter planes anyway? Obama’s mesmerizing speeches surely render all forms of military conflict unnecessary.
We are so screwed!
8
posted on
08/12/2009 6:20:31 PM PDT
by
rbg81
(DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
To: rbg81
“Obamas mesmerizing speeches surely render all forms of military conflict unnecessary.”
I don’t know about his speeches making military conflict unnecessary, but his policies sure are going to make it impossible for the US.
Is this an unintended consequence? Probably not?
9
posted on
08/12/2009 6:24:14 PM PDT
by
Cincinnatus.45-70
(Patriotism to DemocRats is like sunlight to Dracula.)
To: Nachum
It was futile discussing the demise of the F-22 here with all those utterly convinced it was an unneeded dog, especially since the F-35 was going to do all F-22 could do and more, its supporters faithfully told us.
And now, what will those F-22 hating F-35 supporters say when it's their F-35 following in the F-22s footsteps? Oh, I know...our drone air force will fly to our rescue!
Obviously, we don't need manned fighters any more than we needed guns in those fighters way, way back when. Finally, technology has made obsolete the notion that those who fail to heed history are doomed to repeat it.
10
posted on
08/12/2009 6:24:48 PM PDT
by
GBA
To: Nachum
Didn't 0bama tell you that war is obsolete now that he's in office? We're all one big happy global family. We're going to work together for our shared prosperity. Why, we could cut the entire defense budget and set up every illegal alien for life! Isn't it great living in 0bamerica?
11
posted on
08/12/2009 6:29:31 PM PDT
by
Trod Upon
(Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
To: Nachum
Yeah, you get it. Reduce America to a third rate military power. Clinton tried it too. “Zero” told us this was his plan.
12
posted on
08/12/2009 7:06:15 PM PDT
by
Eagles6
( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck. (Let them eat arugula!))
To: GBA
"
And now, what will those F-22 hating F-35 supporters say when it's their F-35 following in the F-22s footsteps? Oh, I know...our drone air force will fly to our rescue!"
Nah, too high tech and costly, this more what the dems have in mind...
To: Nachum
You got it because they have to pay for Universal Health Care.
Ahh the college professors at work. They are so smart!
To: Nachum
Just one more step in weakening America. Granted the F-22 was expensive. But the best fighter in the world.
Now the F-35 JSF is being cut.
Congress was able to find money for their private Jets, but protecting America? Well that's a different story.
We need both aircraft to maintain air superiority in the coming years. No other nation has the ability to take us on in the air at this point. Why give it up?
15
posted on
08/12/2009 8:21:44 PM PDT
by
Doc91678
(Doc91678)
To: rbg81
Maybe we can buy some Su 35s from the Russians cheaper? Its a sad day for the USA. Wait until war comes and we are caught without a modern AF and our enemies have better ships. Think 1941 Japanese Zero vs P 40s. This may save bucks to cut the F-35 but in the end it will cost American lives.
To: magslinger
To: Nachum
18
posted on
08/12/2009 9:46:50 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(Live free or die.)
To: Forward the Light Brigade
With proper tactics, the P40 kicked Zero ass.
Read about the Flying Tigers.
19
posted on
08/12/2009 9:51:07 PM PDT
by
ASOC
(Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui)
To: Jet Jaguar
Thanks for the link.
I remember his comments well.
20
posted on
08/12/2009 9:51:27 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson