To: TitansAFC
A National Inquirer article....on Freerepublic?
Is this seriously news?
10 posted on
08/12/2009 3:19:40 PM PDT by
scottdeus12
(Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
To: scottdeus12
The National Enquirer is more trustworthy than the New York Times.
11 posted on
08/12/2009 3:20:34 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: scottdeus12
They broke the story when the MSM supported Edwards by ignoring it.
13 posted on
08/12/2009 3:21:23 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
To: scottdeus12
Batboy aside, when the National Enquirer does politics, it always backs up what it prints. They were right about John Edwards all along.
Wait for John-Boy to marry Rielle as soon as Elizabeth is in the ground.
15 posted on
08/12/2009 3:22:16 PM PDT by
sinanju
To: scottdeus12
It’s serious news to me, regardless of the source.
A Dem presidential candidate caught in (another) lie and the mainstream covers Zero’s staged town hall.
23 posted on
08/12/2009 3:24:08 PM PDT by
Sparko
("Reporting dissent is the highest form of patriotism! "- - Barack Obama in his dreams.)
To: scottdeus12
Yes. They caught the ambulance chaser redhanded visiting his mistress last year when he was supposed to be at some conference. They do better work than the MSM 80% of the time.
45 posted on
08/12/2009 3:34:49 PM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson