Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

Catastophic coverage and MSAs. I’m with you.

Of course, while that’s fine for working stiffs like me, what to do for those who can’t even feed themselves, no less buy insurance and save against illness?


24 posted on 08/12/2009 11:39:12 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: swain_forkbeard
Of course, while that’s fine for working stiffs like me, what to do for those who can’t even feed themselves, no less buy insurance and save against illness?

The article proposes some kind of government funding for their MSAs and insurance purchases. And it's a tricky areas. First of all, regarding the cost to taxpayers - it's already happening through Medicaid, so that would be a wash. But taxpayer funding for MSAs will probably make food stamp fraud look tame by comparison - all that government money sitting in millions of personal MSA accounts is gonna draw the vultures. So it's definitely an Achilles heel to such an approach.

But despite such weaknesses, it still has the most potential IMO. Medicare and Medicaid are already rife with fraud as it is.

26 posted on 08/12/2009 11:43:41 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson