As far as I’m concerned and as I mentioned numerous times, it never was about a curtailment of rights.
And I am saying you are wrong in that regard - you broached the subject initially as a security matter, and that was what I responded to - where does the security perimeter end, then, with POTUS around? A deer rifle in a home 200 yards away is a much greater potential security risk than someone openly carrying a handgun 100 yards away - an average marksman can hit a target at 200 yards with a scoped rifle, whereas it's almost impossible to hit a target at 100 yards with a handgun. Where does the security perimeter end, then, along with the denial of rights such involves?