Maybe you could realize that a short article doesn't usually have all the facts. The protestor in question was outside protesting alongside the street. He was not in the building nor did he try to enter such.
Secondly, I have been clear about what my issue is. If you want to waffle some more, just agree with my point and slither on by.
Your issue is not germane to the actual situation here. That is the problem. You don't have all the facts. And you apparently can't be bothered to run them down once you are appraised of such.
Accidental ignorance is curable. Your deliberate form of ignorance typically is not, and it leads to stupid strawman arguments like you have posted here.
You have proven you're misreading and just carrying on an argument because you thought some newbie put you in your place.
God forbid a seasoned, perfect poster such as you would ever be wrong. Well you were wrong about newbie and wrong on your tie ins on your comments. Now go away before you're benched for the rest of the game.