To: whatisthetruth
Continued the terse letter, "Moreover, we ask that you explain how our client can repudiate views which are not his own and why he should satisfy your client that there has been 'a true shift of position' when the only issue has been the misunderstanding by your client as to what his views are. It seems odd that this embarrassing affair is not getting more press in England. It's not as if Brown's government is popular at the moment.
10 posted on
08/11/2009 8:38:39 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
If they accuse him of saying something he didn’t say, well if he wishes he can go on the air and say he doesn’t believe in whatever that he never believed in but Britain has its pants in a wad about.
Did Savage ever want to go to England in the first place? I think he should boycott them no matter what they do now.
14 posted on
08/11/2009 8:44:49 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(The Democrat Party: a criminal organization masquerading as a political party)
To: Cicero
Ordinarily, terse is better than not. But in this case, I would have taken the risk of adding just one more sentence: “Alternatively, Her Majesty’s Government can go screw itself.”
22 posted on
08/11/2009 9:07:57 AM PDT by
Clioman
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson