Actually I wonder how many actual birth certificates it takes to move a name up to the stratospheric level of 2409th most popular baby name.
1 posted on
08/11/2009 7:09:44 AM PDT by
tlb
To: tlb
We did all get screwed on Nov. 4th.
To: tlb
HIV infection rate, on the other hand, explodes?
3 posted on
08/11/2009 7:11:33 AM PDT by
Newtoidaho
(Liberals are nothing more than drooling buffoons. Spread the word.)
To: tlb
in nine months there would be a virtual Obama baby boom Uhhh.... that would require heterosexual activity, wouldn't it?
4 posted on
08/11/2009 7:12:13 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: tlb
Check the number of abortions. After all we wouldn’t want them punished with ... A BABY!
To: tlb
Who cares about whatever this "baby boom" thing is. I still haven't received my unicorn. OBAMA PROMISED ME A UNICORN!!!! I'm so disillusioned.
The previous post was sarcasm, for those who take things a wee bit too literal.
6 posted on
08/11/2009 7:15:29 AM PDT by
kb2614
(Cheer up, for the worst is yet to come!)
To: tlb
The problem is, you don’t get babies from anal, as we all got it up the butt on November 4th. . .
7 posted on
08/11/2009 7:16:56 AM PDT by
Salgak
(Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
To: tlb
Finally, some good news - no increase in liberal breeding.
8 posted on
08/11/2009 7:18:14 AM PDT by
TonyInOhio
(The Second Amendment is the guarantor of the First.)
To: tlb
“Research evidence gives scant support for a one-day or one-month fertility ‘spike’ due to the election,” Donald Bogue, a University of Chicago demographer and sociologist, wrote in an e-mail. “Births are now predominantly planned and not very responsive to good news.”
Uh, what “good news” would that be? That the economy went down the crapper?
9 posted on
08/11/2009 7:24:15 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(Question Marxist Authority)
To: tlb
Obama voters are impotent?
11 posted on
08/11/2009 7:27:36 AM PDT by
xcamel
(The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
To: tlb
Funny jokes aside, the implications of this article are just too damned creepy....
14 posted on
08/11/2009 7:39:49 AM PDT by
kromike
To: tlb
Libtards don't have babies, they have abortions.
Μολὼν λάβε
15 posted on
08/11/2009 8:04:13 AM PDT by
wastoute
(translation of tag "Come and get them (bastards)" or "come get some")
To: tlb; All
In 2008, the name Barack set what's believed to be a record for the Social Security Administration's annual Most Popular Baby Names list by skyrocketing more than 10,000 spots on the list, from No. 12,535 in 2007 to No. 2,409 in 2008. And the Social Security Administration predicts the name will even crack the top 1,000 this year You know, I feel sorry for those innocent children.
How many innocent little German infants were named "adolph" back in the 30s?
16 posted on
08/11/2009 8:17:01 AM PDT by
markomalley
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: tlb
They got it all wrong!! They should look at stats at abortuaries 6-8 wks post election. Do you really think the libtards that conceived out of a free will sexual encounter would carry to term ?
17 posted on
08/11/2009 8:28:25 AM PDT by
stevecmd
To: tlb
Check the police blotters 20 years from now to see how many Baracks figure prominently in them.
18 posted on
08/11/2009 8:48:34 AM PDT by
Loyalist
(If a tree falls in the forest, and the media is not there to cover it, does it make a headline?)
To: tlb
20 posted on
08/11/2009 9:24:40 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
