I agree. Some of Corsi’s research in WND’s article 106135 (see below) seems to be based on what he reads in questionable sources. I don’t see strong evidence of authentic research.
What about the credibility of WorldNetDaily as well? Remember when WND published this statement on 2 August?
{{ WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical. }}
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=105764
And two days later, the very SAME statement in this article:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=106016
Now along comes Corsi who shows a purportedly Kenyan document titled “Return of birth . . .” that looks altogether different from the Kenyan Certification of Registration of Birth:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=106135
After that, Corsi cites propaganda from, of all sources, the highly UNtrustworthy, pro-Obama biased Washington Independent!
Does Corsi mention, breathe one word about, the “other birth certificates FROM KENYA” whose form appears “to be IDENTICAL”? (Emphasis added)
What is going on? Do WND editors not check WND’s articles for content errors? Did WND lie in its first and second article? Or are certain Kenyans trying to discredit Orly’s find?
I no longer trust WND. That publication tends toward sensationalism, and the articles I cited disagree on an extremely important basic fact.
No, of course not. Otherwise they wouldn't be stuck with egg on their face every other day. I'm amazed it took you this long to figure it out.