[wideminded]

I saw that after my last post but it still doesn't convince me since the source may just be the previous paper document. After all, were academic records even stored on computers in 1961? And if the UW could provide this nice computer printed transcript, why was the previous microfilmed-looking item necessary?

#300 is another post by the guy who claims to have been there. Maybe he's delusional or a "troll", although he doesn't sound that way. I may be on the UW campus in a few weeks, so if this hasn't been resolved by then, perhaps I can look up the dates myself.

[FTJM]

I saw that after my last post but it still doesn't convince me since the source may just be the previous paper document. After all, were academic records even stored on computers in 1961? And if the UW could provide this nice computer printed transcript, why was the previous microfilmed-looking item necessary?

#300 is another post by the guy who claims to have been there. Maybe he's delusional or a "troll", although he doesn't sound that way. I may be on the UW campus in a few weeks, so if this hasn't been resolved by then, perhaps I can look up the dates myself.

Ummm...the COLB produced by Obama was generated from a computer. WND showed both the original and the computer generated record for comparison. See how that works...