Sorry for all the confusion, I understand what you are trying to tell me...but what I am trying to explain is:
‘Anna Obama’ is listed in the Polk Directory 1961/62.
‘Obama. Stanley Ann Dunham’ is on the University course attendance card.
‘Stanley Ann Dunham’ is the name on the letter received through FOI - from the University with dates of ‘attendance’ - where-as the card shows ‘extension courses’
Each one contradicts the other to a certain extent.
Why?
Why is it that everything to do with her, is such a mess?
Might it be that she NEEDED to make it appear she was living at a certain address to someone or some people who KNEW of her as Anna Obama?
Might it be that she enrolled as Stanley Ann Dunham because she had to identify herself when she enrolled?
Might it be that the OBAMA was added to the enrollment AFTER SHE TOOK THE NAME?
Might it be that she was NOT on the mainland?
Might it be that someone helpful, who understood her need to be SHOWN as living on the mainland, whilst she was elsewhere...collected the course work for her, mailed it to her...and if necessary, handed it in when completed?
All I am trying to do is show how it’s possible to LOOK as if you are in one place whilst NOT even being in the COUNTRY!
And what about the poor postman...what does he do with letters addressed to Stanley Ann Dunham, the one enrolled at the University...send them back?
Are you sure you aren't confusing the University of Hawaii letter with the University of Washington letter. She was "Dunham" when she first enrolled at U. Hawaii. They may just keep the record under that name, even if it changes latter. Can't recall if that was done with my wife's records or not. We married when she had about year left as an undergrad.
The card shows both Extension courses and for the Spring quarter of '62, regular courses. So does the printed transcript from U. Washington.