Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rolling_stone

I think, first off, that your post is largely supportive of my argument.
Second, I think STATUTORY citizenship at birth is VERY strong evidence of Natural Born Citizenship status.

As you say, no court has ever ruled, but I think that, given the opportunity, SCOTUS will rule as I have stated here:

Natural Born Citizen means Citizen at Birth!


262 posted on 08/09/2009 7:15:26 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58
You obviously have not been following this debate for the last year...there are numerous at length discussions on Natural Born Citizen for Constitutional purposes. Lawyers argue both sides and Judges decide. According to your idea, a person born to two illegal alien parents who just happen to drop the baby on this side of the border and he resides in the US for 14 years maybe with still illegal parents is eligible to be President of the US. I think not and if that is the case we need to know so we can fix it.

While they are at it they should end the misinterpreted 14th amendment in the jurisdiction of which currently is interpreted to allow for Anchor Babies, a miscarriage of Justice, Its like saying if you break into a bank and get caught you get to keep the money, we should have stopped you before you entered the bank. Ridiculous.

265 posted on 08/09/2009 7:23:39 AM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

To: Kansas58

NOPE.


274 posted on 08/09/2009 9:05:03 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson