Yep—it won’t work because “they” are by far superior at dirty fighting than the good guys are.
Remember the British too thought that the Americans fought unfairly.”They” are far more experienced/adept/forceful, etc. in these things.
In the long run, “they” will/have prevail what with more voters/activists, etc. to vote, e.g., democraps, the dead, illegals, etc. all voting at least once!
See Also;
Who the hell is this Alimski guy?
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2009/08/08/gunny-g-so-just-who-the-hell-is-this-guy-saul-alinski/
But the good guys - us - have more guns, and we know how to hunt and survive.
Hmm remember the Wellstone memorial? This crap doesn't work for them. It costs them votes from the squishy middle. Thugdom might get the hard cored on each end all hot and bothered, it scares the hell out of the middle.
“Who the hell is this Alimski guy?”
Well, gunny, he’s the guy who’s beating the hell out of the conservatives. He’s not doing it alone, but has many clones in the political left doing his bidding, from Chicago, where he got his political start.
I just bought a copy of his Rules For Radicals and am dipping into it. What he has said so far is right mirrored by the Clintons, and Obama.
This is where we have to start reading and not only reacting, but improving on his program. Unfortunately, the Pubbies haven’t the guts or grit to do much so far.
Doc Steve, USN Corpman, Korea
If your analysis were accurate, how do you explain that the good guys won in 1994, 2000 and 2002?