Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
The allegation that ALL nutrients will be REMOVED from ALL foods is preposterous. Nothing on this thread provides evidence that such a thing is being attempted.

I've long thought that Codex was a distraction from real issues. It may still be. But 2479 is a monstrosity. It was toned down a little, but still contains requirements for all food sellers and preparers to have federal registration and inspection. Also all ingredients of food, whether added or naturally occuring can be regulated for purposes of "food safety".

I suggest you take a hard long look at 2479. Read the whole thing. Your statement is technically correct, nothing in it says that all nutrients will be removed. But in 2479, any ingredient, whether natural or added, can be removed at the direction of government "scientists" (you know the ones who brought us "global warming").

347 posted on 08/10/2009 10:56:32 AM PDT by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
I'm opposed to 2479 and I have vegetable gardens and livestock. I'm also opposed to the Codex.

But just for pointing out the "technically correct," look at the abuse that has been heaped.

The hyperbole and the ad hominem reaction only serve to blunt credibility of 2479/Codex criticism.

348 posted on 08/10/2009 11:01:13 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson