Unless Orly’s copy is completely different, then chances are it’s also a fake.
I downloaded the copy from her site when it was first posted and from every indication that I see, it comes pretty close to the ‘punkd’ one.
I looked at post #548 and you can definitely see the similarities in the seal.
I am not totally saying Orly’s copy is fake. But the evidence sure points that way.
The punk’d edition was started with one of the fakes of the original. You’re being herded to a conclusion not warranted by the exhibit in evidence. It is actually not possible at this time to know if the Orly exhibit is a fake. But Obama’s little liars platoon want mischaracterization to be the zeitgeist for this exhibit. The Aussie exhibit is a proven fake. Jury is still out on the original Orly exhibit.
There are similarities between the seal and the coin. But do we know the size of the coin in question and do we know the size of the paper so we can verify that they match?
You can do anything on the computer. I certainly can not make out the writing on the seal in the Orly document. Also it is not clear to me how you get an imprint in an actual document with a coin.
Yes the seal has similarities to the coin. But that would make sense if the coin uses an official emblem of the Republic of Kenya. see http://allthingskenyan.com/currency.html
But what is the size of the coin supposedly used to emboss the paper compared to the seal in Orly’s photograph? Do we know the paper size that would have been used for the Certification in 1964? What about size of the coin?
Also how does one emboss with a coin.
I know you can fake it in Photoshop.