Just creating it is not a fraud. Attempting to pass it off as genuine in an official proceeding is fraud. If anyone is in legal jeopardy here, it's Orly. She filed it with the court and tried to get the court to act based on it.
What would be interesting is how the document got into Orly's possession. Note that her motion to the court only said that she "has it in [her] possession," but doesn't say how she got it. If she just got it in the mail from an anonymous sender and ran to file it in court without doing any due diligence, she is very likely subject to sanctions.
If this is real, looks like Orly was using a photo given to her by the owner of the bedspread background. Her filing mentioned a photo. I wonder if she ever had an original.
no, she asked the court to determine if it WAS authentic.
Stop with the absurd disinformation.
Read her comlpaint.
Orly didn’t try to pass it off as genuine. She submitted to the court for authentication.
Didn't she pleaded the court's help to authentication???
For her to be in legal or disciplinary peril, she'd must have made false representations to the court with the intent to deceive. In other words, the court would have to prove that she knew it was a phony BC. If she made a good faith representation, then she's in no legal jeopardy. Just to clarify, I'm not a Orly sycophant.
How could she have it in her possession if its all torn up and crumpled? How could any document examiner miss ink jet ink? Some fact is not straight here.
Anyway, this really does get to the issue that folks are intensely upset that the President is withholding this information and they want to know why.
That "act" was merely to get the document authenticated. She never represented it the court as authentic.