It's interesting how evolutionists make numerous philosophical assertions, and when you address these with a philosophy article or argument, they dismiss it as 'just philosophy'. Darwinism is science, you see. No philosophy comes out of the mouth of a Darwinian, even when he's talking philosophy.
Quite so. But Darwinism is all the beans and sauce with a bit science pork tossed in to justify the the name on the label.
And it is the philosophy of Darwinism that many creationists find objectionable more than the science, however faulty that is. Overturn the science and the philosophy would remain.