Same song different verse, is avoidance, misdirection, and ridicule, all you have?
Must be because your reply was totally lacking in any supporting evidence.
But then when the facts do not support your argument all that is left is that “liberal” straw man to knock down.
Let me assist you since you are plainly factually challenged. Lucy is a 3.2 million year old Australopithecus afarensis fossil discovered in northern Ethiopia, Ida is a 47 million year old Darwinius massillae fossil discovered in Germany who’s overall proportions and anatomy resemble that of a lemur.
I would also see red flags when peer review shows your hypothisis to be flawed…………
“The burden of proof is upon intelligent design advocates to show through scientific research that intelligent design is a useful scientific proposition. If they did, the science-funding agency review panels would gladly fund such research. As things stand now, intelligent design can be considered neither scientific nor useful for understanding nature.
There has been a history of promissory notes from intelligent design proponents, but where is the actual research? Here we can agree with intelligent design proponent Stephen C. Meyer when he says, “The debate isn’t going to be settled by numbers, it’s going to be settled by the evidence and the arguments.” But these arguments must be made to the scientific community, not to the movie-going public.”
“Today, the theory of evolution is an accepted fact for everyone but a fundamentalist minority, whose objections are based not on reasoning but on doctrinaire adherence to religious principles” ~ James D Watson.
Your running in the title for sir-project-alot has been duly noted.