[pissant]

We are on to you, you little marxist bootlicker. And Yes, Poltijab is in bed with DU and Kos, and you go THERE to get your debunking? You limp wristed little troll. Say hi to Maddow from FR next time the commie beeyatch invites you onto her ratings anemic show.

[Cicero]

Well, I saw at least one post on a thread I’ve misplaced saying that the Bomford birth certificate shows signs of being photoshopped, because overlays appear on it if you know how to look. In fact, if I remember correctly, I think it was his teenage daughter who made the discovery. I can’t vouch for that, but it sounded reasonable enough. Maybe someone else has the first-hand evidence.

Also, I remember seeing that “Bomford” is a misspelling for “Bamford.” Can’t vouch for that, either, but it sounds like a Daily Kos quality forgery to me.

So, this guy goes to a website where insane leftists exchange memes-of-the-moment about it without actually doing any research or logical thinking?

How comforting.

[marron]

I just need confirmation that the BC Taitz has is actual paper. I know it appears to be on the web.

If it is, then the credibility tilts toward her until “Bomford” comes up with his paper doc. Whichever one is on paper is probably the real one, and the one that is just pixels on a website is probably the doctored one.

I’m suspicious of the Bomford for a couple of reasons. First, the text on his is too perfect where the creases cut through the letter. Second, you can’t get to his image from within the Bomford website. Thirdly, until this blew up, how ever would anyone have found it through Google? The story of how it came out isn’t very believable to me at least. Fourthly, apparently the website was edited within a couple of days of the new doc’s appearance on the scene. Looks suspicious to me.

Still, if Bomford produces a 50 year old paper doc, and Taitz’s is just pixels, then hers is the fake. I suspect until proven otherwise that its the other way around.

[the anti-liberal]

None of this matters. What matters is whether the document Orly has is authentic, and whether there is an actual entry for 0 at 44b, page 5733 - either at Kenya or London.

Personally, I'm just going to be patient and wait until that info is sorted.

[Dryman]

“FREE THE LONG FORM!”

[astyanax]

One more reason to doubt that even the release of every Obama record would please the birthers;
And that's a reason to release nothing?
Or to question those who want it released?
His logic is... fascinating.

[STE=Q]

The anti-birthers are circling the wagons!

... they’re scared of an original hard copy (cost: about $12.00) of Obama’s vault birth certificate... the “long-form” certificate with the “missing” information on it... information that he’s spending thousands of dollars in legal fees — to suppress!

STE=Q

[BorderRaven]

Is it possible Barack Hussein Obama II, was born in Kenya, and the birth was later recorded in Honolulu?

See

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28068666/Timeline-Obama-Kenya-Possibility

[kcvl]

David Weigel

[kcvl]

David Weigel on CPAC

Paul’s victory was not embraced by everyone in the room.

“Conservatives were united in trying to diminish this result,” Weigel says. “Conservatives don’t want their image to the American people to be septuagenarian politicians who bang on about the need to close down American bases and speak at meetings of the John Birch Society ... It was accidentally very revealing of how far right the party’s gotten.”