To: john in springfield
Or, to put the two right next to each other:
Note that the first is slightly tilted. And it appears to be a variation of the present seal of the Australian government. The kangaroo's tail appears to be in the air, not on the ground. The shield is a bit more oval shaped. The curly-cues are a bit different.
It would appear to be an earlier, or at least different, version of the seal of the Australian government.
576 posted on
08/05/2009 6:01:19 PM PDT by
john in springfield
(One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
To: john in springfield
I didn’t even mention how someone demonstrated the price on the form indicated an Australian, not a Kenyan, origin.
578 posted on
08/05/2009 6:04:48 PM PDT by
john in springfield
(One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe such things.No ordinary man could be such a fool.)
To: john in springfield
If you're claim that the south australian document is real, due to that seal, then that right there would discredit that document: official state badge of south australia, the piping shrike, proclaimed in 1904, latter modified in 1910
state coat of arms - current since 1984
coat of arms 1936-1984 consisted of a shield with a partial sun emblem on it, with 3 gathered sleeves of grain above it. linking to private site to avoid wasting their bandwidth- http://www.ngw.nl/int/aus/southaus.htm
south australia had it's own set of state badges, and coat of arms. it would not use the australian coat of arms, for an official state document.
To: john in springfield
ANother image of official government seal of south australia.
591 posted on
08/05/2009 9:10:55 PM PDT by
Mount Athos
(A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson