Replies

If the Bomford certificate is the fake, why did the forgers add a whole new section to the document that does not even exist on the Kenya certificate?

Perhaps that was taken from the original Bomford BC?

I don’t follow ? ? (Sorry, not much sleep this week.)

So, the logic goes like this?
1. There was an original Bomford certificate that looked almost identical to the Kenyan certificate.
2. After the Kenyan certificate was created, a fake Bomford certificate was made, adding in the section that was in the original Bomford certificate, then uploaded, to debunk the Kenyan certificate debunkers.

I don’t follow ? ? (Sorry, not much sleep this week.)

No, that's not quite what I am suggesting as a POSSIBILITY. I'm assuming that there has been a bomford BC posted on that site for years and that everything was legit with it.

Then the Kenya BC story breaks a few days ago and some DUmmie posts a BLACK Kenya BC and begs everyone at the DUmster to make their own copies to distribute with all kinds of false and phony names to muddy the waters. This we know is FACT and you have probably seen the documentation.

Some DUmmy (or some other kook) decides to plant a BC on the net to discredit the Kenyan. For whatever reason (random or otherwise), they pick the legit Bomford BC that is already up. They take the legitimate information from the Bomford doc (and include the information at the very bottom) and put it on their Kenyan BLANK BC. The only text in the Bomford doc they change is a couple of names to match the Kenya BC, so people will see it and say "Oh, that can't be a coincidence. The Kenya BC must have used the Aussie as a template!"

They then upload the "new and improved" Bomford BC, replacing the one that had been there, using the same file name and "viola!".

Is that what happened? I have no idea, but the Bomford BC we've been looking at could be a combination of TWO BCs, mostly based on the Kenya BC.