BS. I warned you that the Kangas stuff was from a liberal site, but was written in English for the most part. That’s why I used it for the thread. I double checked the items and provided a link to more scholarly articles written at a higher level.
I find it amazing that you can find one of the goofy things that Kangas said and zero in on that, and miss all the rest. Did you bother to read any of the two Professor Caplan articles?
Did you just happen to notice that the Austrians don’t really do any numbers to back up their theories, and no testing ala the scientific method? Kangas, and Caplan also pointed out fallacies between the real world and the Austrian’s theories.
And though it is admittedly an ad hominem argument, what about ‘Ol Lew Rockwell being the Chairman of the von Mise org?
I went overboard to provide plenty of information about the Austrian school for your perusal. If all you want to do is find funny stuff to laugh at on Kangas, go to his “gun” articles. They are hilarious.
Now, pull your head out of your hind quarters, git yorself to that non-liberal link I provided, grab a cold beer or two, and start reading.
parsy, the honest and forthright!
There are many many “goofy” analyses, as you call them on that site. There are misrepresentations and strawman examples on each of the Commentaries. There is no truth there - only lies.
Your acceptance of the bogus “scientific method” sophistry says little for your understanding of logical analysis.
Economics is NOT science.
However, I will take the time to check out what you call “more scholarly articles.”
I retract nothing of what I said about the other site’s contents. Absolute rubbish.