Circular reasoning? No, its called the scientific method.
parsy.
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-ausmain.htm
The group of short essays found at your link above is one of the most dishonest displays of malicious ignorance I have ever witnessed. Take this sh*t for example:
“...Socialism has been proposed in many forms, ranging from social democracy to anarcho-socialism. In the latter, workers would own companies that would compete on the free market, absent any government at all. As you can see, socialism is hardly synonymous with a central planning committee. But one thing socialism cannot be is a dictatorship — worker’s do not own anything if a totalitarian government tells them what to do. Mises and Hayek may have refuted the principle of economic totalitarianism, but they didn’t come close to refuting socialism. This is one reason why academia didn’t view their arguments against socialism as conclusive.”
That you would encourage the spreading of lies on this site does not speak well of you.
Sorry, but that’s the way it is.
The output of the scientific method are observable and repeatable facts (ex: water boils at 100 °C at sea level) not more data collection.