Skip to comments.
'GAY' SHERLOCK HOLMES COULD BACKFIRE FOR GUY RITCHIE
NYPost ^
| 04 Aug 2009
| Staff
Posted on 08/04/2009 11:12:32 AM PDT by AreaMan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
1
posted on
08/04/2009 11:12:32 AM PDT
by
AreaMan
To: AreaMan
Disgusting, and nothing new. Rupert Evert’s Sherlock Holmes on PBS was gay.
2
posted on
08/04/2009 11:13:51 AM PDT
by
La Lydia
To: AreaMan
Now I know to avoid this movie like the plague. Thanks for the info. The thought of watching Downey and the other dude make out makes me want to puke.
3
posted on
08/04/2009 11:13:55 AM PDT
by
Astronaut
To: AreaMan
’ Holmes, has revealed the crimebuster will sleep with and have sweaty grappling scenes with Watson’
WTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4
posted on
08/04/2009 11:14:23 AM PDT
by
BGHater
(Insanity is voting for Republicans and expecting Conservatism.)
To: AreaMan
5
posted on
08/04/2009 11:14:23 AM PDT
by
ZeitgeistSurfer
(Caution, Obama Zombies Ahead!)
To: AreaMan
“It’s bad-ass,” .........dude, it is gay!
6
posted on
08/04/2009 11:16:30 AM PDT
by
Wu
(Excuse me while I kiss the sky......)
To: AreaMan
Well I was thinking of seeing it...but not anymore.
To: AreaMan

Guy Ritchie himself seems to have an attraction to "manly" persons
To: AreaMan
Saw the preview to this recently, looked like it might be good, but there was no hint of this crap.
To: AreaMan
Jeremy Brett is the only real Sherlock. R.I.P.
10
posted on
08/04/2009 11:18:15 AM PDT
by
fullchroma
(I want my country back.)
To: AreaMan
“Alimentary my dear Watson.”
11
posted on
08/04/2009 11:18:25 AM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: AreaMan
“How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?” - Sherlock Holmes in The Sign of the Four
12
posted on
08/04/2009 11:18:56 AM PDT
by
rdax
To: ZeitgeistSurfer
Whos next? Santa Claus? Oh, I'm sure someone has pitched that idea already. I'm sure they'd also LOVE to portray Jesus as gay too. These are some sick people here.
13
posted on
08/04/2009 11:19:25 AM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Are we not men? No ... we are Jim Thompson!)
To: Astronaut
Second time today I've had an opportunity to post this image:
14
posted on
08/04/2009 11:20:05 AM PDT
by
GSWarrior
(Don't patronize the birther threads.)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
15
posted on
08/04/2009 11:20:47 AM PDT
by
allmendream
(Income is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?)
To: AreaMan
I don’t see any indication there’s actual kissing or intercourse in the movie. There’s nothing wrong with men sleeping in the same bed—it happened a lot in the old days—or men wrestling. It all depends on wat sort of inuendo they use. If it’s all sweaty fun, fine. If they stare deeply into eachothers’ eyes or or hug a lot, like in “Alexander,” that’s different.
To: La Lydia
I agree that this is revolting. Dr. Watson is clearly a straight man who falls in love with a woman at first sight in the second novel!
17
posted on
08/04/2009 11:21:14 AM PDT
by
jpl
(Help us Obambi Wan Kenobi, you're our only dope.)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: AreaMan
How will the movie deal with the fact that Watson was married?
19
posted on
08/04/2009 11:22:00 AM PDT
by
ltc8k6
To: AreaMan
What a waste! I have all 14 of the original films with Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce and I don't need to see this kind of crap.
20
posted on
08/04/2009 11:22:48 AM PDT
by
ditto h
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson