Posted on 08/04/2009 10:22:35 AM PDT by DakotaRed
And DOWN goes the server...
You talking about Red State or the WH?
Red State has an article about this according to Rush and I couldn’t log on to their site a minute ago....lol. It’s crashed.
I sent them an email. I told them I had heard Dick Durbin and Obama lying about the healthcare takeover.
Someone needs to mail them the cap-and-trade bill, too. “Dear White House: I am sending you this evidence that someone is trying to raise taxes on energy behind our backs. Please take prompt action to stop this madness.”
Call For Informants: If You Oppose Obamacare, Even in ‘Casual Conversation,’ the White House Wants to Know About It
Posted by Jeff Emanuel (Profile)
Tuesday, August 4th at 1:45PM EDT
6 Comments
If you see anybody publicly opposing President Obama’s plan to implement a government-centric overhaul of the health care system, the White House wants you to report that person (or persons) ASAP.
From the White House website:
There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.
Emphasis added. Of course, as we’ve seen in the health care debate to date, the term “disinformation” is used by the Obama White House as a catchall to describe any opposition to the President’s push for single-payer, government-run health care — meaning the White House wants to be informed of any forwarded emails or blog posts or any “casual conversations” that could be taken as opposition to their health care overhaul plan.
The White House has, as yet, offered no explanation of what it is they plan to do with the tips on policy opposition they hope to receive from citizen informers.
Interestingly, as Jake Tapper pointed out on Twitter this morning, the title of that post on the White House is a quote from John Adams’ 1770 “Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials.”
(h/t Jon Henke)
The whitehouse email is going to be so full of crap that it won’t be of ANY use to them.
We need to keep this tactic in mind for all their future “blueshirting” programs.
Can you believe these punks running our government? Like many here, I keep up with all of the outrages everyday coming out of 1600(mainly thanks to FR) and sometimes I can’t believe what we are witnessing! I think they are trying to push people over the edge with this orchestrated marxist take-over of America and systematic disfranchisement of over half of the population who are against the government take-over of healthcare.
They are trying to incite violence and hoping for some civil strife and riots. What else can explain it all? They have the media doing everything in their power to stir up anger on our side by calling us racists, nutters,unruly mobs, etc.
Stay calm folks..Stay focused and let’s not be intimidated or provoked.
NOW GET THOSE EMAILS OUT!! GET OUT TO THOSE TOWN HALL MEETINGS AND LET’S MAKE SOME NOISE!
Interesting...
Especially in view us ‘trouble-making plebes’ are the only ones that actually READ the bill.
There’s no way they read it... or they couldn’t vote for it.
If you load up the servers that is good but setting a precedent to rat out dissenters is bad. However I do see your point...
Heeeeeere Fishy Fishy Fishy!
Have sent three hundred anti socialist health care articles to the hot line so far today. Maybe they will educate some of the poor souls at the White House. I don’t think Der Fuhrer was quite ready for the tsunami of citizen revolt against the bill that is rising up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.